sculpting
New member
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2009
- Messages
- 4,148
So in Neurolinguistic programming there is a theory that different eye movements correspond to different types of information retrieval-verbal, visual or Kinesthetic, either imagined or remembered.
Here is a site that talks about it in more depth:
NLP Eye Accessing Cues
After I started paying attention to this I realized that the Jungian cognitive functions seem to match very closely and repeatedly to eye movements.
Ne-(NLP visual retrieval)-upwards at angles
Ti-Very direct, piercing, observing, even staring albeit the INTPs are a little spacier in their stares.
Fi-(NLP kinesthetic)-downward glances, little direct eye contact
Fe-in terts like EXTPs, they do lots of side glances-verbal retrieval
Fe-in doms and auxs, they seem to do a lot of softly directing looks paired with soft controlled smiles, and some side glancing
Ni-drooling, not really in the room with the rest of us. Some Ni doms will actually have whole conversations with you while they stare off into space.
Te-dominating, almost glare like. My enfps will actually pair this with a crinkled brow. INTJs will alternate the Ni drool look with the very direct Te glare. It isnt just studying-like Ti-it is almost confrontational.
Se and Si-I dont quite have a fix on these two yet. Most of my Si users use Te looks and most of my Se users use Fe or Te looks.
Anyways this is all I use anymore to type people. It is always right so far. More so than anything else-clothing, speech, face or whatever. But the dynamic aspect seems important-you have to watch the fluctuations between looks while they talk.
Typically the eyes will alternate between two different types of looks-Ne, Fi or Ne, Te for me, but sometimes combining into NeFi as a combination. In the second post I will put my pics trying to illustrate this for me.
Can you guys help me confirm or deny? Can you watch a couple of folks around you and see if this seems true?
Here is a site that talks about it in more depth:
NLP Eye Accessing Cues
After I started paying attention to this I realized that the Jungian cognitive functions seem to match very closely and repeatedly to eye movements.
Ne-(NLP visual retrieval)-upwards at angles
Ti-Very direct, piercing, observing, even staring albeit the INTPs are a little spacier in their stares.
Fi-(NLP kinesthetic)-downward glances, little direct eye contact
Fe-in terts like EXTPs, they do lots of side glances-verbal retrieval
Fe-in doms and auxs, they seem to do a lot of softly directing looks paired with soft controlled smiles, and some side glancing
Ni-drooling, not really in the room with the rest of us. Some Ni doms will actually have whole conversations with you while they stare off into space.
Te-dominating, almost glare like. My enfps will actually pair this with a crinkled brow. INTJs will alternate the Ni drool look with the very direct Te glare. It isnt just studying-like Ti-it is almost confrontational.
Se and Si-I dont quite have a fix on these two yet. Most of my Si users use Te looks and most of my Se users use Fe or Te looks.
Anyways this is all I use anymore to type people. It is always right so far. More so than anything else-clothing, speech, face or whatever. But the dynamic aspect seems important-you have to watch the fluctuations between looks while they talk.
Typically the eyes will alternate between two different types of looks-Ne, Fi or Ne, Te for me, but sometimes combining into NeFi as a combination. In the second post I will put my pics trying to illustrate this for me.
Can you guys help me confirm or deny? Can you watch a couple of folks around you and see if this seems true?