Sx/So's of any type are
- raw
- instinctual
- passionate
- impulsive
- intense
- lusty/desirous
- full of sexual energy, it may not be directed toward sex, but it is still a sexual energy
- demand attention (and tend to get it)
- emotional
- a yin/yang quality. fiery, lusty and intense some of the time; tender and intimate at other times.
- a sense of longing for something
Dunno.
I think many are, yes. But not always. You are like "Sx/So are great necessarly", it's impossible that every Sx/So's are like that.
Many Sx/So's are actually also:
-shy
-hung up
-close-minded
-dogmatic
-paranoid
-shizotipal and/or schizoid
-cowards
-extremely avoidant and reclusive
-hateful of people and of the opposite sex
-repress their impulsions and instincts
-frugal and prude
-obsessive-compulsive
-dependant personality disorder
-low-key and effaced
- etc
The thing is that, if you take Patti Smith, for example, she is impulsive, she is fantastical, she is great, yes, but when she was 14 she was a complete loser, she was totally unatractive, she was insfignificant, a marginal, she was nothing in the high-school hierarchy. But she has an instinctive drive to overcome it.
Also, Dennis Rodman, Howard Hughes and Catwoman are good examples of that: navigate between avoidance, shyness and self-effaced temperament and addictive alpha male or femme fatale, charismatic and obssessed with sex.
[youtube=3CrDbBBAbEY]Beyond The Glory - Dennis Rodman (Part1)[/youtube]
[youtube=ez4rbj1AZGg]The Secret History: Howard Hughes, Bizarre Billionaire (1/5)[/youtube]
[youtube=u3hl3hSa1lc]Selina tranforms[/youtube]
You can also see that with David Bowie, Freddy Mercury, Lady Gaga, Dennis Hopper, and tons of others.
I think the duality between the personality and the instinctual stacking is a bit like a river and a rock. Te acquiered personality (enneatype) is a rock, the instinctual stacking is the river, the water
always achieve to pass through the rock, it's just a matter of time, and it sculpt it in forms of emmotional habits and emotional coping stretgy called "subtypes".
This gallery of pics of Charles Bukowski illustrate that pretty well also: at the end he fits very well with your list of adjectives, but during his youth, not at all:
http://charlesbukowski.free.fr/photographies.html
I think that every Sx people are characterized by a need to be at the top of the food chain, and with Sx/So, the result is a strong leaning to be "guru" or ayatollah. Sometime very prude and frugal, but very oriented toward intensity:
[youtube=0AgW_9bijzE]Imam Khomeini speaking abt the Iran Iraq war[/youtube]
[youtube=qbF0JQgi7_U]Adolf Hitler speech February 10 ,3of3[/youtube]
The nature of Sx/So, I think, is a low tolerance for the status quo, a tendency to live life and see the world like a series of intense visons and dream sequence, a drive to provoke, shock, seduce people and manipulate the crowds, to push boundaries, be palatial and be something more than a human. Also, a trouble with self-pres thing, sometimes an abuse and dependance of this, sometimes a deliberate refuse of confort and safety and simply a goblal neglect.
sx/soc: My impression of their writing is "fire-and-ice", as if one is to experience the extremes of heat and coldness at the same time. Often abstract, spilling one inner vision after another like a dream-sequence. Seems particularly in touch with the core meaning of life and death.
[youtube=Y8odEyQdUEk]Sx/So[/youtube]
[youtube=aXBdrJcPJc0]Sx/So[/youtube]
Hum, yeah...