I see intersectionality, feminism, PC-stuff, "liberal" rhetoric...
I just think:
People are forgetting how to understand, just like how Adam Smith said they would.
---
Its easy to brand things, "good" and "the enemy", and to trump up issues into a oversimplified polarity: there are no quick fixes, because nothing has just one face, and nothing is just one thing.
Stop thinking black and white, or the next time around, the quick fix gets more starkly simple and blunt until it becomes savage, when the people decide to start using blatant atrocity to fix the instability they've backed themselves into, cause of all the running away from the guile of "the enemy".
---
Its not fun watching fascism grow in my country, and all the cool uni kids don't care cause black-nationalism can't be "fascist" in their world view.
---
relative privilege must always exist unless we find a way to vaccinate against all forms of liberty: if you want to change something, it requires involvement on the ground. Complaints are not involvement. Demands are not involvement.
Be the change, don't beg for privileges by advocating self-harm to the "established".
Destabilizing a structure doesn't promise to reveal a pot of gold under the rubble, wake up.
Non-policy based revolution is reactionary, non-policy based revolution is fascism. A real revolution is not the promise of an alternative*, it is the alternative, if you can't describe how your alternative will work, your a reactionary fascist-shill.
*like, what does that even mean— when people have this vague idea, that 'somehow' promises, to be 'totally different!'. If that were even true, you could of had those polcies published on the net, and eventually win an election somewhere, but this hasn't happened: because these sorts of people don't really care, they are power-sycophants, and wannabe tyrants, the basic fall-back tendencies of all of the proto-fascist "liberals" that can't pick up the historical accounts of Nazi rhetoric that their ideologically replicating in with their identical strategies.
-
Demands that are made on reality, contain further demands for the consequences thereof. Because, (like Jung said,) what you resist, persists. The question is more like: How can I/You do it differently, don't rely on the debtor's plea of relinquishing responsibility and integrity.
-
this has been my Public Service announcement for the politically misguided peoples that require spiritual edification so as to help avert the great looming crises.
---