From Socionics:
Ej (mbti ENTJ, ESTJ, ENFJ, ESFJ) - Linear-Assertive
Ep (mbti ENTP, ESTP, ENFP, ESFP) - Flexible-Adaptive
Ip (mbti INFJ, INTJ, ISTJ, ISFJ) - Receptive-Adaptive
Ij (mbti INTP, INFP, ISFP, ISTP) - Balanced-Stable
NT - Researcher/ Scientific-Researching
NF - Humanitarian/ Humanitarian-Artisanal
SF - Social/ Social-Communicative
ST - Pragmatist/ Technical-Managerial
I like the N/S-F/T terms, except for researcher for NT. It's not necessarily a worse term than "intellectual", but I think Si dominants fit as researchers too, so I'm not a fan of the term.
Yeah I definitely could see that, however I feel it's important to note that those are from Socionics where it defines Si quite differently from how it is defined in MBTI and other systems so I think it fits the system it's from.
Ej (mbti ENTJ, ESTJ, ENFJ, ESFJ) - Linear-Assertive
Ep (mbti ENTP, ESTP, ENFP, ESFP) - Flexible-Adaptive
Ip (mbti INFJ, INTJ, ISTJ, ISFJ) - Receptive-Adaptive
Ij (mbti INTP, INFP, ISFP, ISTP) - Balanced-Stable
EP = explorers
IJ = searchers
EJ = modifiers
IP = optimisers
I think "modifier" is too ambiguous of a term for extroverted judgment. I'm thinking "impacters", "operators", "controllers". Operator has a more Te slant, Controller could have negative connotations.
And "Pleasers".
- - - Updated - - -
"Servants"
That sounds Fe-ish (were you thinking it also applies to Te?), but it doesnt have the connotations I'm looking for with this.
I think it can, although it goes against the stereotype.
By the way, if Objective Personality has their own terminology for the quadrants i mentioned, feel free to post it in this thread.
I think it's strange to call Si/Ni dominants "receptive-adaptive" so yeah there does seem a divide in the understanding there.
Oh, makes sense then. Seems odd word choice though.They're receptive and adaptive to the inner data; —which might look totally unreceptive and unadaptive, to those on the outside.