Ilah
New member
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2008
- Messages
- 274
- MBTI Type
- INTJ
I have noticed that the various books, websites, people posting on the site have different descriptions about what each function is like. Some vary a little, some vary a lot. Some emphasize different things.
I would like to include any description of the functions, MBTI, socionics and variations on these theories of personality.
Some of these are compatable for me. By this I mean I would rate myself as consistently high (or low) in function by according to all the descriptions.
Some of these are not compatable for me. By this I mean I would rate myself as high in a function according to some of the descriptions, but low in the same function according to other descriptions.
I'm not really sure which way to go with the contradictions.
I also am not sure how to interpret a desciption that kind of fits me. For example if it lists 5 things that describe Si and 3 fit me and 2 don't. Does that mean I am average? Are some parts of it more important than others?
I would like to include any description of the functions, MBTI, socionics and variations on these theories of personality.
Some of these are compatable for me. By this I mean I would rate myself as consistently high (or low) in function by according to all the descriptions.
Some of these are not compatable for me. By this I mean I would rate myself as high in a function according to some of the descriptions, but low in the same function according to other descriptions.
I'm not really sure which way to go with the contradictions.
I also am not sure how to interpret a desciption that kind of fits me. For example if it lists 5 things that describe Si and 3 fit me and 2 don't. Does that mean I am average? Are some parts of it more important than others?