simulatedworld
Freshman Member
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2008
- Messages
- 5,552
- MBTI Type
- ENTP
- Enneagram
- 7w6
- Instinctual Variant
- sx/so
Stop doing drugs.
It's fried your brain to the point where you have either ignored, or forgotten,
every post I have made about an alternative to MBTI.
blah blah blah. If you understand the concepts, why do you insist on convincing everyone that you don't?
This is why I don't want to deal with you.
You have no memory of past conversations.
You lie.
You post high all the time,
so no one knows how fucked up your brain is, at any moment in time.
I don't even feel any need to comment on how out of touch with reality the attitude behind this part is. Suffice it to say I'll consider it a personal victory that you're so out of relevant material that you have to resort to this.
You are the one who ignored an INTJ who told you about the Five Factor Model.
You are the one who ignored me, when I told you about Singer-Loomis.
You are stuck on MBTI.
Some of us have open minds.
You do not.
Umm...okay, WHO is it that doesn't have any memory for past conversations?
Like the part where I promptly took the Big 5 test, posted my results and discussed implications in the very thread you're discussing?
You can spew all the crap you want about "open minds", but it's not going to change the perceptions of anyone reading the thread unless you can provide some legitimate explanation.
You run around yelling functions at people:
"You damn Te!"
Hell, one of the few people around here with an open mind about typology is INTP Eric B.
Oh that's right, you body-slammed INPs the other night in a post,
right after you read me talking with Eric.
I like Eric.
He does his homework.
He's not a lazy fuck who mouths off to people, like you do.
Eric B's cool. Nothing in that thread was directed at him personally. INPs have their strengths and weaknesses just like any other type; if you took that to mean I think they're completely worthless or have no valuable skills, then I'd have to just chalk it up to your childish need for binary certainty again. You really ought to do something about that.
That's why I keep yelling at you about Te; you seem to have a rather unbalanced functional makeup--either that or you have some other reason for continually picking fights with people/whining about how useless typology is.
The most annoying part is that I'm well aware that you understand these concepts, so again I must inquire, why are you so intent on convincing everyone that you don't?
You contradict yourself all the time.
You have no consistency of thought.
And when your little feeeeeewings get hurt,
you send people obnoxious rep comments like a child.
GROW UP.
No consistency of thought lolz.
Oh boy, lessons in internal consistency of principle from a J...and even better, lessons in HOW NOT TO BE OBNOXIOUS from an ENTJ!
That's rich.
Seriously though, here's a hint from someone who's put far more study into psychological type than you have (and no, that doesn't mean running around in flagrant denial about the fact that it can't be scientifically Tested...if your writing didn't display a constant desire to dismiss anything that you can't put in a test tube, I wouldn't mock for you blatant Te myopia so much, lol):
Anyway, this is characteristic of P vs. J conflicts because Js tend to come off more stubborn/rigid than they think they do, and Ps have the opposite problem with consistency.
Js see Ps as flighty, inconsistent, and unsure of their positions, because Ps mostly direct the flexible/spontaneous Perceiving attitude toward the outer world...hence your criticism that I have no consistency of thought. In reality, Ps are far more internally consistent than they appear--that just isn't the side they show to others most often.
Likewise, Js have a very flexible internal perspective and are unaware of the degree to which their rigid outward organizational attitude dominates their appearance to others.
So there's something we can both work on.
(Don't trust me though, even though I know what I'm talking about, cause I do DRUGS!!!!)