A core tenet of American Socionics is that the "nuts and bolts of Jung's definitions for the functions control in Socionics." Naturally, Jung is the best resources for characteristics about Ni. Gulenko himself, after extensive study, finally conceded Stackemup Typologys point, socionics and mbti are both branches of Jung. The functions are defined by Jung and the main difference between MBTi and socionics is that socionics organizes Jung's functions into Model A (Krepinski) and contains intertype relations.
To summarize Jung's definition of Ni, Ni is a rich, highly nuanced, detailed inner world that makes the outer world look like a needless distraction (or even somewhat non-existent). When Ni-doms find a way to bridge their inner world with the outer world, that's where you largely see them coming out of their inner world to interact with the external environment and what they bring is something original and unique. Reality is a canvas Ni imposes its imagination/inner world upon so what IEI brings to the world is typically a revolution in some form.
NiFe (IEI) converts inner worlds into new modes of expression...NiTe (ILI) converts inner words into new modes of thought.
Feel free to provide Jung's definition of Ni in your own words.
To summarize Jung's definition of Ni, Ni is a rich, highly nuanced, detailed inner world that makes the outer world look like a needless distraction (or even somewhat non-existent). When Ni-doms find a way to bridge their inner world with the outer world, that's where you largely see them coming out of their inner world to interact with the external environment and what they bring is something original and unique. Reality is a canvas Ni imposes its imagination/inner world upon so what IEI brings to the world is typically a revolution in some form.
NiFe (IEI) converts inner worlds into new modes of expression...NiTe (ILI) converts inner words into new modes of thought.
Feel free to provide Jung's definition of Ni in your own words.