miss fortune
not to be trusted
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2007
- Messages
- 20,589
- Enneagram
- 827
- Instinctual Variant
- sp/so
Your rationale is feeler rationale based on value judgements of the facts, thus you reject them as such because they're not pleasant to hear? (I thought we were talking about the scripture-based interpretation of original sin from the Bible.)
my response is based on feeling because religion is not a logical thing people rarely find religion through careful deduction, they feel it... why should my response to such an article be any different? we all use thinking functions/we all use feeling functions- otherwise we are not complete human beings
I was not aware that the thread had any rules on what aspect we were to approach the question from either... looking at things from a social psych perspective comes naturally to me, so why should my response not be from that viewpoint as well?
interesting that you're attempting to discredit me for what perspective I choose for my response... I view religion or lack thereof to be a personal thing