You first. Demonstrate your premise first, then let's go from there.There never seems to be more personal conflict than between NF's. Explain.
You first. Demonstrate your premise first, then let's go from there.
See, look! Arguing already!
(mua ha ha)
NFs only argue when fully supplied with emoticons.
No proof though, but the conflict seems far less NF driven and far more "sensitive" and "reactionary".
(I know with most INFPs I've known, they use such general terms and abstractions to avoid friction that I am not exactly sure what the problem is, and I have to basically play 20 Questions until they nod to me and say I figured out what has been bothering them.)
Spot on.Conflicts tend to be more common among Sensors than intuitors because they often dont see the big picture and end up quibbling over minor discrepancies. NFs, being the most diplomatic tend to fair best at avoiding conflicts. They, especially INFPs, are very keenly aware of what is worth fighting for. So when they decide to fight, they fight big and stand out, and because they stand out so much, it begins to appear that by their nature they have a lot to do with conflict.
There never seems to be more personal conflict than between NF's. Explain.
This is funny. I will tell people flat out, honest, blunt what the problem is and I will still get the blank or amused look from them. I often feel like I am speaking a different language than they understand.
That's odd. I wonder if it's because what is clear to you is not clear to them, or whether the orientation you're approaching things from is just too abstract... or? (I have no idea!)
If you do manage to be blunt, that's good. (Your posts seem to show a willingness to be pointed, when you feel you need to be.) I think age and experience also helps a great deal to round things out.
The sense of how life and things ought to be is quite strong in NFs. All other differences can be set aside but that.
(The more I try to explain... it seems like the less clarity there is )
Conflicts tend to be more common among Sensors than intuitors because they often dont see the big picture and end up quibbling over minor discrepancies. NFs, being the most diplomatic tend to fair best at avoiding conflicts. They, especially INFPs, are very keenly aware of what is worth fighting for. So when they decide to fight, they fight big and stand out, and because they stand out so much, it begins to appear that by their nature they have a lot to do with conflict.
To me, it seems like it has a lot to do with neuroticism, which is dominated, at least on this board, by NFs (judging from the FFM tests that were posted... )
(NF) -> (Female dominance) -> (Neurotic) -> Conflict
No proof though, but the conflict seems far less NF driven and far more "sensitive" and "reactionary".