Lucifer
New member
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2008
- Messages
- 246
- MBTI Type
- ENTJ
You're insanely ENTJ.
Really ?
You're insanely ENTJ.
Really ?
I don't see why people have such a problem with Nocapszy.
^I think stress pushes your internal standard (thought processes/unconscious tendencies) further from the external standard, so your intuition might look more introverted (more internally focused) in those times. Without stress, Ni can certainly focus on the environment more (that's what perception does, anyway -- focuses on the environment, turns it into inputs for other cognitive functions), because you aren't as fearful of the external world.
Well, Ni both turns inward (introverts) and looks inward (intuits). So it cannot perceive outward alone. Ni needs inferior Se to feed it with new inspirations to ponder. But unlike the ESxP, the INxJ's sensory experience is never for its own sake, but only as a jumping off point.
I don't see why people have such a problem with Nocapszy.
He's a smart kid. His method of communication isn't always conventional, but most of what he says is pretty spot-on.
It's true that Intuition is dependent on Sensing, but that goes for Ne and Si, too.
I don't see why people have such a problem with Nocapszy.
He's a smart kid. His method of communication isn't always conventional, but most of what he says is pretty spot-on.
He's extremely rude. He is arrogant to the point of counter-productivity and ignorance, often presuming himself to be the best authority possible on anything, with a real distaste for hearing that he is wrong. He seems to have essentially no constructive aim to his arguments. He has a huge to tendency to use different forms of ad hominem fallacy. And lasty, he likes to ignore points, and ask questions and then not make use of the answers. A fundamental part of his arguing style is to simply act like you never said anything of the things that proved him wrong, even if you quote them over and over agian.
You know, mitzy, you might want to embrace being an ESFP. They basically don't exist on this forum, so it would make you special.
He's extremely rude. He is arrogant to the point of counter-productivity and ignorance, often presuming himself to be the best authority possible on anything, with a real distaste for hearing that he is wrong. He seems to have essentially no constructive aim to his arguments. He has a huge to tendency to use different forms of ad hominem fallacy. And lasty, he likes to ignore points, and ask questions and then not make use of the answers. A fundamental part of his arguing style is to simply act like you never said anything of the things that proved him wrong, even if you quote them over and over agian.