ENTP are NOT mostly type 8. If you look again you will see that they are mostly type 7.
I think the main problem isn't the sample size (at least for many types), but rather the self-selection bias. The data we have describes people who participate (or at least register) on a typology forum. But I agree it's thought provoking.
[MENTION=8936]highlander[/MENTION], could you also post the count for each MBTI + enneagram type? It would be interesting to see which combos are the most populous. Another interesting piece of data would be post counts per MBTI + enneagram type (or average post count for each MBTI + enneagram type). That would give one an idea of what the mix of content looks like, rather than the mix of registered users.
The raw data for TypologyCentral is here in this post. To normalize it, I multiplied each of the individual numbers in the table x the CPP % divided by the Actual Forum Percentage.
I was hoping the data in some form where one wouldn't have to retype a bazillion* tiny numbers again oneself (like CSV or Excel or something). I'm also still interested in getting posts per "box," as well (since I think it would be interesting to know what the typical post ratio would be). It would also be interesting to see how that data changes over time (although then we are getting into larger data sets).
* = not an accurate estimate
You mean when people change their types in either MBTI or Enneagram or both? That would be interesting and valuable; unfortunately it would be hard to obtain.
This is great! It looks pretty accurate too. I would have thought more INTJs would be 3 though. It's also hard for me to get used to ENTPs being 8, but I guess the data doesn't lie. Unless the data providers are mistaken.
ENTP are NOT mostly type 8. If you look again you will see that they are mostly type 7.
I was hoping the data in some form where one wouldn't have to retype a bazillion* tiny numbers again oneself (like CSV or Excel or something). I'm also still interested in getting posts per "box," as well (since I think it would be interesting to know what the typical post ratio would be). It would also be interesting to see how that data changes over time (although then we are getting into larger data sets).
* = not an accurate estimate
I feel like I'm impossible! I'm literally the stereotypical INFP but I CANNOT relate to type 4 at all! Every time I do the enneagram test the results are always either 9w1, 2w1, 6w7, or 7w6. 4w5 is nothing like me!
I guess enneagram sort of correlates with cognitive functions more than MBTI? Cos despite being INFP I do not nave a pronounced Fi. My dominant functions are actually Ne and Fe.
I also have an INTJ friend whose enneagram is actually 1w2. According to the chart up there there are no type two INTJs?
I feel like I'm impossible! I'm literally the stereotypical INFP but I CANNOT relate to type 4 at all! Every time I do the enneagram test the results are always either 9w1, 2w1, 6w7, or 7w6. 4w5 is nothing like me!
I guess enneagram sort of correlates with cognitive functions more than MBTI? Cos despite being INFP I do not nave a pronounced Fi. My dominant functions are actually Ne and Fe.
I also have an INTJ friend whose enneagram is actually 1w2. According to the chart up there there are no type two INTJs?
Actually, the top 3 enneagram types for INFPs on the forum are 4, 9, and 5 according to this thread.I feel like I'm impossible! I'm literally the stereotypical INFP but I CANNOT relate to type 4 at all! Every time I do the enneagram test the results are always either 9w1, 2w1, 6w7, or 7w6. 4w5 is nothing like me!
I guess enneagram sort of correlates with cognitive functions more than MBTI? Cos despite being INFP I do not nave a pronounced Fi. My dominant functions are actually Ne and Fe.
I also have an INTJ friend whose enneagram is actually 1w2. According to the chart up there there are no type two INTJs?