First off, where are the descriptions of Ti and Fi that you've read? If you're having
this much confusion then the descriptions are obviously not good, of the functions and of the types, because ISTPs and ISFPs are very different.
What type descriptions can you relate to more? ISTP or ISFP?
I've seen what you've typed in other threads, and you seem to have a hard time believing that you have good Te (I'm pretty much set on you being ISFP). Is this what's causing most of your confusion? Being unable to put yourself in a box like the rest of the crowd? You don't have to be exactly like them. I can't relate to many other INFPs, if you can't relate to ISFPs then that's fine. You can just be different. Just so you know my Te is good as well, and that's caused me to sometimes doubt it, but eh not really anymore.
I think you may be confused for another reason, do you communicate in a T way? It's very possible to be an F and communicate like a T (I do this). Just because you act a certain way doesn't mean you're a certain type, what's on the inside is what matters.
I linked this in another thread of yours, but here it is again.
http://www.typologycentral.com/foru...-duper-typology-overview-doom.html#post603900
Which of these can you relate to more? (Again linked in other thread)
Fi- Valuing; considering importance and worth; reviewing for incongruity; evaluating something based on the truths on which it is based; clarifying values to achieve accord; deciding if something is of significance and worth standing up for.
Ti- Analyzing; categorizing; evaluating according to principles and whether something fits the framework or model; figuring out the principles on which something works; checking for inconsistencies; clarying definitions to get more precision
EDIT: I'm not being rude mentioning the other threads, I'm saying it because maybe you could read what you and others said and perhaps find some clarity there. Hint, hint.
![winkwink :newwink: :newwink:](/data/vbsmilies/wink-intjmom.gif)