kendoiwan
I am Sofa King!!!
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2008
- Messages
- 1,334
- MBTI Type
- IsTP
I'm reading what you say, how you say it, and what is insinuated by it. The way people set their feet in a discussion and what they respond to, don't respond to, and how they respond to it is all indicators of stance and purpose to me. Specific content itself (i.e., the specific words and stated ideas) is just one factor.
That's you and others assuming, and reading into my statements selectively. I repeatedly said, this is how I see it and I don't knock anyone else who sees it different. I went out of my way to point out millions of people fell on both sides of the "debate" so there was no one right answer.
I don't insinuate. I say what I think.
lol... To me, when you don't specify, you're insisting that your view is a universal standard -- "this is just how it is!"
I said, "the standard is my own etc..." Someone wasn't "listening".
Anyway, now it sounds like we're both on the same page?![]()
Agreeing to disagree and enjoying (or not), the ride? Sure.
EDIT: Note I inadvertently used the phrase "to me" twice in this post alone. Yes, I specify... it's part of qualifying things, to me. DARN, THREE TIMES!!! Arrrgg!
Didn't notice too busy looking at your ass...
![Blush :blush: :blush:](/data/vbsmilies/blush.gif)