entropie
Permabanned
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2008
- Messages
- 16,767
- MBTI Type
- entp
- Enneagram
- 783
Ok you guys lost me long ago, but what I meant is that:
human emotion can be a guide to subjective feeling. Human emotion tho can be no guide to the objective claim of thinking. Since humans evolved from animals and invented thinking as in rationality and reason the first time in the late 16th century, every of our action is motivated by emotion or feeling cause that is what we are. Even the intention of being as objective as possible and following the scripture of rationality as good as we can, basically is an attitude, so a subjective preference, cause not everybody does that by nature. Everybody tho has subjective preferences by nature.
That means that the feeling and the thinking function are generally out of sync or in a different dimension. Thinking is like a code of conduct or a religion or a scripture you adapt in your live to control your emotions. Of course there may be people who have a lot lesser trouble with their emotions, but does that mean those are actually the real thinkers ? Or are those the real thinkers who managed to control their strong emotions via thinking ? So is the one who has it naturally or the one who mastered it the thinker ?
Jung already was wrong here imo, all along. You cant compare apples and banana. But I agree that eyeryone shares a subjective and an objective approach to the nature of his judgement and that not everyone has them properly separated everytime. the question that remains tho is: is it necessary to seperate them for your personal growth or is the mastering of the inseparable the desired goal ?
human emotion can be a guide to subjective feeling. Human emotion tho can be no guide to the objective claim of thinking. Since humans evolved from animals and invented thinking as in rationality and reason the first time in the late 16th century, every of our action is motivated by emotion or feeling cause that is what we are. Even the intention of being as objective as possible and following the scripture of rationality as good as we can, basically is an attitude, so a subjective preference, cause not everybody does that by nature. Everybody tho has subjective preferences by nature.
That means that the feeling and the thinking function are generally out of sync or in a different dimension. Thinking is like a code of conduct or a religion or a scripture you adapt in your live to control your emotions. Of course there may be people who have a lot lesser trouble with their emotions, but does that mean those are actually the real thinkers ? Or are those the real thinkers who managed to control their strong emotions via thinking ? So is the one who has it naturally or the one who mastered it the thinker ?
Jung already was wrong here imo, all along. You cant compare apples and banana. But I agree that eyeryone shares a subjective and an objective approach to the nature of his judgement and that not everyone has them properly separated everytime. the question that remains tho is: is it necessary to seperate them for your personal growth or is the mastering of the inseparable the desired goal ?