F
figsfiggyfigs
Guest
That we all die eventually.
Let us all agree that someone who judges this statement will either agree or disagree to it.
Judging to neither agree nor disagree is always a nice option with my given statement. I was going to have it edited to add 'partially agree' and 'partially disagree' but I agreed with my hopes. Scale is always a given.Mu. I'm a follower of the middle path.
Judging to neither agree nor disagree is always a nice option with my given statement. I was going to have it edited to add 'partially agree' and 'partially disagree' but I agreed with my hopes.
Oh, always so much fun. A new challenge for another time then.Whew.. I'm glad I jumped in first. I'm not sure I'm up to the challenge...
Let us all agree that someone who judges this statement will either agree or disagree to it.
This statement is a bit misleading as it is built up from two sentences, one of which is a tautology whereas the other appears to be contingent on the truth-value of the first one, which I don't think is exactly the case.
While it is true that everyone who judges the statement does indeed agree or disagree with it when the only two possible judgments are either agreement or disagreement, it is still possible to disagree with the stronger assertion that everybody ought to agree with the whole sentence. Take a person who only understands the fist half of the sentence and takes the second half to mean some nonsense; such a person can still make a judgment about the sentence and disagree with it and while it does strengthen the assertion to a third person who observes that upon judging the statement, the judger did indeed do one of the two things - they disagreed with it, it still doesn't change that it is in fact possible to disagree with it.
Straight on. I can catagorically claim disagree with everything [MENTION=6071]Oakysage[/MENTION] says from here on out. The precludes me from even attempting to acertain the validity of a statement, or even bother reading it. (Hah! Preemptive decisive strike!)
Yes, of course. Though perhaps you have many ways of dealing with the played situation. Assuming everyone who had read my statement understood it in its supposed context. Would they be able to inherently disagree with it in truth after purposely doing so? One would have to take an underlying belief of criteria that certain truth is inherently false so that what they understand as truth is believed to be false (to them). This is not stating much of a point other than to re-instate my question in hypothetical perception which I suppose is not necessarily being done here.This statement is a bit misleading as it is built up from two sentences, one of which is a tautology whereas the other appears to be contingent on the truth-value of the first one, which I don't think is exactly the case.
While it is true that everyone who judges the statement does indeed agree or disagree with it when the only two possible judgments are either agreement or disagreement, it is still possible to disagree with the stronger assertion that everybody ought to agree with the whole sentence. Take a person who only understands the fist half of the sentence and takes the second half to mean some nonsense; such a person can still make a judgment about the sentence and disagree with it and while it does strengthen the assertion to a third person who observes that upon judging the statement, the judger did indeed do one of the two things - they disagreed with it, it still doesn't change that it is in fact possible to disagree with it.
That we all die eventually.
Shall I compare thee to a summer's day?
Thou art more lovely and more temperate.
Rough winds do shake the darling buds of May,
And summer's lease hath all too short a date.
Sometime too hot the eye of heaven shines,
And often is his gold complexion dimmed;
And every fair from fair sometime declines,
By chance, or nature's changing course, untrimmed;
But thy eternal summer shall not fade,
Nor lose possession of that fair thou ow'st,
Nor shall death brag thou wand'rest in his shade,
When in eternal lines to Time thou grow'st.
So long as men can breathe, or eyes can see,
So long lives this, and this gives life to thee.
The car is the best guy to be in Monopoly.