Oh, Okay. Then you conceed that it is not
impossible for ENFP's to use Fe, but that it is simply,
unlikely.
But thank you for the info, this is something I will have to do more reading on.
Fe = directly judging value of things(is it worth it or not) according to external standards
Fi = using internal standards to judge value of things
Fi users always use internal judgment of values in the end(is it valuable enough for me). even if they would see value of things in external world(empathizing from Fi), the decision comes from inside. if something goes against their own value judgments(Fi), they simply refuse to do so, naturally its not this simple as you can look one thing from multiple angles, something might not have enough value to act accordingly, but if you look at it from different angle it might have some other value, so you might go with it even tho it goes against some internal value standards.
for example, you dont like to take it in the butt, but your boyfriend does. you might let him do so, even tho its not valuable for you, when you look at it from the angle of what you like. but then you look at it from the angle of, you love your boyfriend and want to please him. this is not Fe, even tho it might lead to same outcome as usage of Fe would. you let him, because
you love your boyfriend, so its valuable for you to please him and go against your own wants. -> it just looks like Fe, but its not. NFPs dont use Fe, because there is always the criteria of value for self. also there are other factors not related to functions, like if you were raised to please others, but this again is learned value for self.
Fe user would look at what value it has to his boyfriend, naturally using Ti abstraction on things like if his dick is so big that it would rip the virgin butt, and therefore judge that its not worth it, again this would look like Fi, because its judging F(e) introverted(Ti).
its same with Ne and Se. Ne users doesent use Se, because Se = direct perception of external world to conscious. Ne does similar thing, but it goes to unconscious processing first, that links up the details, seeing where they came from and where they could be going(this way constructing big picture view on external things). naturally Ne user can see details too, but they dont come directly to conscious mind, conscious mind needs to focus on them after perceiving the big picture. again it might seem like the Ne user is using Se and it can lead to similar outcomes(perception of details), but its not Se, because Ne user perceives external world from unconscious first, instead perceiving it directly.
So wait, INTP, would you subscribe to what I referred to as Fi-inspired Fe for ENFPs?
(basically, from an Fi value recognizing social etiquette is important to the person in front of you and using Ne to figure out the system behind it, so you can then 'mirror' at them what makes them feel comfortable, much the same way as you naturally do with people and anything you learn about them anyways)
its not Fi ispired Fe, because you are using your internal judgment on judging the value value, its simply Fi that has been empathized(by Ne) or/and Ne abstracted(by Fi).
would you care about its value to other person if the person(or the situation being smooth for you and people you do care about) didnt have any value for you? or would you dislike to mirror someone who is pissed off?