And, the unhealthy ENTJ has NO room for other perspectives. She is right. End of story.
I've seen the same thing very much in ENFJ's too. Except that while the ENTJ believes he's
logically right, the ENFJ believes he's
morally right.
The distinction I seem to have noticed is that ENTJ can be persuaded by someone who just stands up to them, faces them down and clearly and directly states their issue with the ENTJ's idea/method/order. They're a bit like Klingons in that way... heheh... you have to be prepared to go through the fireworks to get to the sudden smile, slap on the back and complimentary cup of bloodwine.
They only believe they've done 'wrong' if they can be proven to be objectively, logically wrong, and their logic proven to be flawed. Once you get past that hurdle, they'll start admitting and apologising for any personal pain they caused en route.
Whereas ENFJ will never admit that they've done anything wrong at all, period. They're morally right all the time, and if they're ever logically wrong, then even the biggest amount of proof of it shoved right under their nose won't prevent them from wheedling out with "well I know it doesnt quite make sense, but it's what
feels right, it's just something I have to do". I'd never hear an ENTJ saying that.
And though ENTJ will say a rather lame-ass apology that amounts to "I was right and I'm not budging, but I'm sorry it upsets you" - and they really mean it, they are sorry it upsets you but just not sorry enough to alter their course and quite open about it, the ENFJ's version is even worse IMO: "I was right, therefore you had no right to be upset. I'm not altering my course of action and any decent person would be with me on this" thereby implying that you're actually not a decent person because you disagree with them.
Given a choice between having my logic/work attacked or my personality, I'd prefer the former every time.