BlueScreen
Fail 2.0
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2008
- Messages
- 2,668
- MBTI Type
- YMCA
They may be all exaggerated, but I do think that some tend to be more one-note than others and lack a certain depth. Weirdly enough, I think SJ type descriptions tend to strike me as the most overall accurate, but now that I think about it, it may be because I don't understand them enough to know intricacies about them their descriptions also may ignore.
Yeh, they are made a bit feel good, and over encouraging. The content normally seems to be accurate though; apart from being too definite and generalised. A lot of things about each type are not that visible in the external world either, so it is hard to use descriptions to match to people sometimes. I think they are primarily written to help people identify their own type.
On the hating ENTJs thing, I find them pretty entertaining, and a little wicked. I know at work some people get offended by their approach, but to me it often feels like good banter. I actually love the way they go about things. I think it's because my Te is developing more.
Also, you've got a Seuss name, so you win ENFP points immediately.