yeah, why are we (enfps) so anti that? you'd think we'd be fine it considering the P open-ended thing.
Hmm, ambiguity.
I think-if you have the chance to be in a close, loving relationship with someone-that it will enhance the sexual aspect with a whole other dimension. The softness and fluidity, kisses and touches allow are embedded with extra layers of meaning, like poetry or beautiful prose.
However, if you are not in a relationship, and do not have the option of entering into one, it doesn't mean you still do not yearn for physical intimacy with another person. You still hunger for sex, touching and tasting even if in a lusty, yummy animal sort of way and can get much pleasure there in pleasing your partner and yourself. Perhaps it is a base need but, even in those few moments that you spend with that person, you can intermingle a bit with thier soul, even if you know you will not see them again ever. A piece of you and they have mixed. You can remember thier touch, taste and scent fondly and remember thier expressions, thier movements, and treasure that little bit of closeness.
I know this was a thinker aimed thread, but even as a feeler, I think this sort of short term pleasure seeking relationship is fine and even fun. The trick is to understand walking into it what emotional ties and seperations you are making, set your own expectations and boundaries, while understanding your partners' expectations the best that you can.
(is this gonna get me kicked out of the INTP club?)