[MENTION=15773]greenfairy[/MENTION]
I sincerely doubt you are an ISFJ. It's all about the process as opposed to the end form.
For example I can discuss and argue and bring up information on any number of topics. I can make posts here that come across quite....perhaps intuitive in nature.
But that is only the end form of what my thoughts came out to, my process is still one of recounting information I have experienced personally through Si, when I come across a new problem, my first instinct is to try old methods....then search for new avenues. It's what makes a person like me come across as stupid in some situations that I have not yet experienced, because I struggle to visualise the potentials, instead I work back from my experiences to those potentials, but it takes me a much longer time than say.....an Ne dominant.
If I do use Ne it is nearly always recreational, via hobbies or friendly discussions or when joking. On top of it all is Fe floating like a king. Without even being consciously aware of it till recently, it is clear I desire structured social groups and boundries into which I can fit myself.
Also the suppression of Ti has become apparent to me, because while I am interested in logical discussions and the picking apart of information with inductive thinking, it is not something I apply myself. I simply admire it in others, yet reject it when it comes too close to home, at least until recently.
Now I acknowledge more readily the considerations those angles bring and I enjoy when the revelation is one I can apply to my own life in terms of self awareness. This still ties in to Fe as I hold myself to the accountability of my own consciousness and I do not wish to hurt or harm those I love or like.
But it's a better partnership than merely pressing down on the inferior function while rising up the dominant, as I remember reading that the inferior grows out of conscious control the more the dominant is indulged and the more people avoid challenges that would threaten that dominant inclination.
One cathartic realisation I have had, is that it is better to stick out a bad couple of weeks, or even years, of personal turmoil and stress so that you may come out with a better understanding of yourself and others, as well as having grown, on the other side.
As I have said before, to me it is time people started realising that contextually these functions, (of which we do indeed possess and use all 8 or allegedly so), can apply to any person of any intelligence. I'm not really talking about 'sensor-bias' or any of that mess, more so that while there are challenges in communication between differences in judgment or perception, with wisdom and consideration, it becomes apparent that the real challenge lies in the difference between levels of thinking in individuals and their intelligence.
But this is also a difficult point to identify, because of the difficulty in defining what constitutes intelligence and at what level a person is cogitating. Not to mention different types of intelligence, though that point is very debatable.
Perhaps the real issue is that there are far too many lazy systems that tap into enabling a person's weaker aspects to creep up on them and therefore stopping a person from reaching their full potential. Although that in itself opens up a discussion on whether or not it is for any group or individual to decide on what other individuals or groups should be doing or how 'full potential' is indeed defined.
In any case, my main point is that I cannot see Si dominance in you, even though mine is only secondary, I am the echo's of my senses and all those in my life who have molded and informed me, the negative and the positive.
To me that is Si defined, the personalised aspect of your own sensory experiences, coalescing into a solid whole core which sits at the centre of you.
Do you see that in yourself?