No, fair enough.
Well, I clearly have given this as much thought as you, so my response is not going to be that detailed. That and while trying to put my thoughts into words I hit an immense roadblock.
As you’ve said, relying on emotion too heavily can lead to illogical decisions. And relying too much on logic, while disregarding emotion, can lead to a disregard for life. If you’re always thinking about what is better, logically, you miss out on what is better morally, etc.
You could have a world where political decisions are made on logical basis only. But logic can benefit the greedy as much as the good at heart. Taking human nature into account, you’d be more likely to end up with a dystopian society than you would a better place. I think this part is my main issue. Emotion can be used as a tool just as much as logic. How you use it depends entirely on the individual and humans, as a species, tend to be selfish. It's a trait, among others, that helps aid survival.
This could be two entirely different conversations if you were hypothesising about what could be in this world if the population were suddenly more inclined to thinking and what would the world be if humans had naturally, and originally, more of a preference towards thinking. And it becomes more and more complicated the more facets you introduce, such as religion, culture, etc, etc. I’m not sure where you want to draw the line.
I’d agree that it’s pretty bad. But I do believe it can, and will, get worse. How much worse remains to be seen.