Humans believe they have soul but it does not stop them to kill each other.
And if they kill someone it is not always called murder.
Actually, it typically IS murder in any culture... except in the case of war.
Are we at war with animals?
I remember scene from "The Watchman" when Dr Manhattan build some device and make sex with his girlfriend. When she notice he was doing something else in the same time, she was pissed off.
Do you think she overreacted?
It's a great example, and a comparable one. What it means is that she had needs in the relationship that did not match his needs, and the relationship was doomed if neither could change their needs. Note that Jon did try to honor the relationship by human standards (vs his own) for some time, but eventually he could not maintain it. It's not like he entered the relationship expecting to let Laurie down. In fact, he was involved in an LTR with two women before he realized it no longer held meaning for him, and then he left because it didn't satisfy his needs and he had no desire to hurt a third.
I express my opinion. It's not double standards
You can express your opinion, and still have it be a double standard.
You are expecting more from the woman than the man. I accept it's your opinion, and that it is also a double standard. Why do you expect more from the woman than the man?
S-F is full of questions like that. Where our consciousness start? Can we copy are souls?
Star Trek, Blade Runner, Ghost in the shell. Simple exemples. It is still question without answer.
True. So how does that impact your opinion?
And copy that with thousands others users.
You see her as person with emotions but without body.
I see just a computer with ARTIFICIAL Intelligence who imitate emotions.
Human beings are programmed by nature to have emotions, and they learn how to process emotions by (1) experiencing them and (2) testing them against other people. Samantha did the same thing -- she was programmed by nature to experience and express emotion, and she learns from how Theodore and others respond to her expression.
So far, you are not showing any real DIFFERENCE between humans and the AI that would justify your opinion. It seems more like you're just predisposed to dismiss AI as false without being able to show a reasonable basis for that distinction.
IMHO her emotions weren't real. She study human reactions on her words.
No, she actually was programmed to understand how emotions work (and probably also had some random flux built into it, just like humans), and then she learned by her interactions and honed her emotional complexity.
Yes. Me too. IMHO he was manipulated. When Sam get to know him enough, she left him. She couldn't learn more.
That's rather unfair. He's the one who chose her and chose to invest in her. He initiated the beginning of the relationship. When things turned romantic, he chose to engage an AI as his girlfriend and become emotionally invested and exclusive. Remember, how old was she? She had little actual life experience, while he had a good 30+ years or more.
She entered that relationship on good faith, to the best of her ability, and then when she realized she was changing and it wasn't working out, she sat on it for a while, tried to make it work anyway. She didn't "cheat" on him because she didn't realize it was a big deal, just like jon Osterman didn't realize it with Laurie until they had a fight. At that point, soul-searching occurs, and Samantha realized she could not maintain their relationship as it was, and they were growing apart.
Her trying to remain in the relationship would have made them both miserable, so she ended this. In hindsight, the relationship was a mistake, but neither she nor he anticipated the REALITY of a relationship between AI and human. They learned as they went.
You act as if she maliciously wanted to hurt Theodore and knew all along where things would go. No, she went from "being born" to adulthood in a fairly short period of time by human standards, and had to learn as she went. It's how she was designed, just as humans are. I'm not sure why you are reading her that way. Both parties were hurt when their relationship ended, but since she initiated it (she accepted the reality it wasn't going to work), he had to struggle to catch up... but I suspect he knew where it was going as well by that point.
And ironically, this kind of thing happens all the time in human relationships. It's part of life. Fidelity doesn't really "fix" problems that are so glaringly large.