I've heard of correlations between T with male and F with female. I'm pretty sure it's not as extreme as people seem to assume.
1 is a common fallacy. Sensors tend not to be as bright as Intuitors, but they very much can be.1: Sensors mistaken for intuitives, because the typer feels that sensors aren't that bright.
2: Feelers mistaken for thinkers because the typer thinks that Feelers aren't as bright as thinkers.
3: Thinkers typed as feelers, because they allow their emotions to get the better of them.
4: IPs mistaken for IJs because they form opinions rapidly.
5: IJs mistaken for IPs because they take their time deciding what they are going to do.
Sensors tend not to be as bright as Intuitors, but they very much can be.
INFs are actually smarter on average than ENTs.
I think I'm gonna start using this as a typing criterion.Here's another one I've noticed..
You don't like somebody. They must be SJ.
Sensors don't have an imagination (nor do intuitives have a firm grip on reality ), but that doesn't mean they can't be artists. Lemmy is a fucking awesome ESTP songwriter.All artists ,singer song writers, method actors or just about anyone famous is an N..
Sensors have no imagination.
Sensors don't have an imagination (nor do intuitives have a firm grip on reality ), but that doesn't mean they can't be artists. Lemmy is a fucking awesome ESTP songwriter.
You don't like somebody. They must be SJ.
That's your "evidence"?
Sad but true.
Speaking of which I believe I am an N and my friends I described are S's
fhafhadffshiosdfhiosdfhiosdfhiofsdhofhiosdhiosdfhiosfiosdfhiosdf How is that for a 'common typing error'. That is just as interesting of a question as most MBTI questions.