It is my favourite book ever. Ayn Rand is not only a wonderful writer, but a wonderful philosopher. Atlas Shrugged is the perfect mix between good characterization, intriguing plot and philosophy. I cried several times while reading it. I guess the reason I loved it so much was because a majour theme was value and worth, which is how I view the entire world--in terms of the value or worth of it. I love Dagny Taggart and I wish I were her because she only associates with things that are of worth to her and I admire that because so many times I am surrounded by garbage just because I'm too lazy to take action. That's okay if you don't like it, obviously. I don't understand how anyone could not absolutely love it, but to each his own.
I want to read so I can be justified in my hatred. I can't justify hating something I haven't read.
Haha ok. Why do you hate it if you haven't read it?
Thanks for replying. We do disagree haha.
Good characterization? There were only basic three kinds of people in this book - 1. People like Taggart, who share exactly or nearly exactly the same views as she does. - 2. People who do whatever Taggart says. - 3. People who don't agree with her, who are of course all idiots/misguided. So Ayn Rand is hardly George Eliot at characters haha!
Doesn't everyone only "associate with things that are of worth to them"? Be a bit boring not to.
I think I would hate it because the philosophy sounds like self-absorbed hogwash. I also don't like stories where everyone who doesn't agree with the protagonist is a bad guy or something. The world doesn't work that way.
I think I would hate it because the philosophy sounds like self-absorbed hogwash. I also don't like stories where everyone who doesn't agree with the protagonist is a bad guy or something. The world doesn't work that way.
That's what made them great. She simplified every person down to how they fit into her philosophy and made them each be as integrit (I know it's not a word, but it should be) as possible. Each character only served as a device to her ideals. What I think made them so great is how the good characters were good and the bad characters were bad. There was barely any "believability" in that the good characters had flaws and the bad ones had good traits. It's definitely not realistic by any means, but reality isn't ideal.
It's more than that though. Dagny denounced everything that was worthless instead of just tolerating it or being passive-aggressive.
That's not a very fair approach to a book you've never read before. If you don't give it a chance, of course you'll hate it.
Just because the world doesn't work that way doesn't mean it shouldn't work that way.
"I also don't like stories where everyone who doesn't agree with the protagonist is a bad guy or something."
Isn't that true of the world though? There is one absolute truth and whether Ayn Rand has found it or not, she is submitting to the fact that there is good and evil and people are either good or evil. She gets so much hate for being bold enough to denounce what she hates. I admire her courage in being so blatantly against what she believes is evil.
Every other author cowers behind literary devices that leave things open for interpretation or whatnot and they don't truly take a firm stance as greatly as Ayn Rand does.
It is my favourite book ever. Ayn Rand is not only a wonderful writer, but a wonderful philosopher. Atlas Shrugged is the perfect mix between good characterization, intriguing plot and philosophy. I cried several times while reading it. I guess the reason I loved it so much was because a majour theme was value and worth, which is how I view the entire world--in terms of the value or worth of it. I love Dagny Taggart and I wish I were her because she only associates with things that are of worth to her and I admire that because so many times I am surrounded by garbage just because I'm too lazy to take action. That's okay if you don't like it, obviously. I don't understand how anyone could not absolutely love it, but to each his own.
I want to read so I can be justified in my hatred. I can't justify hating something I haven't read.
I can see what you mean. I think for me though, having realistic like-able characters (sometimes they don't need to be like-able if very realistic or interesting, like if they're a psychopath or something) is one of the most enjoyable parts of reading books.
I didn't really get that. Who is she to decide what's worthless or has value?
I agree to your first part - I expected to hate Jane Austen but Pride and Prejudice and Emma are two of my favourite books. So you never can tell what you're going to like.
I disagree - I don't think good and evil exist at all.
I don't like being preached at, so I like it when authors don't tell you to think a certain way, but decide for yourself. Shakespeare is brilliant at this - I'm reading him at school.
It is my favourite book ever. Ayn Rand is not only a wonderful writer, but a wonderful philosopher. Atlas Shrugged is the perfect mix between good characterization, intriguing plot and philosophy. I cried several times while reading it. I guess the reason I loved it so much was because a majour theme was value and worth, which is how I view the entire world--in terms of the value or worth of it. I love Dagny Taggart and I wish I were her because she only associates with things that are of worth to her and I admire that because so many times I am surrounded by garbage just because I'm too lazy to take action. That's okay if you don't like it, obviously. I don't understand how anyone could not absolutely love it, but to each his own.
I guess that's something we disagree on. Personally, it reminds me too much of real life.
Who is anyone to decide what is worthless or has value? Is no one allowed to have any beliefs or values because we don't have explicit authority to do so?
It was definitely my favorite book for a while. Reading it is a very liberating experience because we can all relate to the people in our lives who try to guilt us and the people who rise in power without merit. These days I still appreciate it but I think it is a work of idealism. Better than communism, but still a world that can't quite exist. I think in reality, Dagney might be a lot more ruthless, wouldn't mind government deals, wouldn't treat her workers so well, etc. But it would be nice if the world were like that.
True, but it's not about one's favorite novel, or liking versus hating it. The original thread was about "best" novel you've ever read.
Atlas Shrugged is the best novel I've ever read in terms of construction and story arc. It was also a good mystery story. Naturally the characters sometimes come across as flat, and the distinction made between "good" and "evil" characters was portrayed unrealistically. The long speeches may also constitute a flaw in the narration, especially considering the fact that Ayn Rand derided Victor Hugo (her favorite novelist) for adding long historical notes.
But as a long-time bibliophile, I can't single out any specific book as my favorite.
No, I'm not saying that. I'm just saying that what's valuable to you is valuable to you - other people might not give a crap about the same stuff so leave them alone haha.
I guess those are two more things we disagree on
I like when authors state as guileless and open as possible their opinions.
Shakespeare drives me insane. His character development is horrible!
But like I said in my first post, to each his own.