You want to know a type, which presupposes function order, so you can do what--
presume X,Y, and Z and stereotype my ass?
No thanks.
2.Republicans, Democrats, it's getting hard to tell the difference. But not many SJ's would criticize the system as a whole.
You want to know a type, which presupposes function order, so you can do what--
presume X,Y, and Z and stereotype my ass?
Maybe you should let the SJ's speak for ourselves? I happen to detest political parties, just as George Washington did. I am also aghast at about 80-90% of what the federal government does in this day and age.
I respect this, (and like your avatar), but I stand by what I said, the SJ's would certainly be the last to detest the system as a whole. This may or may not be a bad thing, I guess that depends on what you believe. But I think it is true nonetheless. You must be grouped with other SJ's within this theory, but you may be a more progressive thinker than most of them. That you are on this website may speak to this. I don't make presuppositions about individuals.
And don't take my other SJ comments too seriously.
you're pretty much in the "pretentious" box because you think you can be someone else by not having a type.
That sounds like something a dogmatic--and ignorant-- prick would say.
You obviously have a closed mind, unable to imagine a possibility,
that hasn't been allowed by MBTI theory.
That makes you a sheep.
Sheep don't lead, they follow.
In order to accept MBTI theory one must actually believe,
each type has a predetermined function order.
I am not the only person on this board who thinks that's bullshit.
That sounds like something a dogmatic--and ignorant-- prick would say.
You obviously have a closed mind, unable to imagine a possibility,
that hasn't been allowed by MBTI theory.
1That makes you a sheep.
Sheep don't lead, they follow.
2In order to accept MBTI theory one must actually believe,
each type has a predetermined function order.
I am not the only person on this board who thinks that's bullshit.
what's the problem?
2. Actually this is not true, MBTI theory has absolutely nothing to do with predetermined functions. Jung came in and added all that stuff later, so you can accept the theory without the functions.
I think that SJ's would be the FIRST to have a problem with a system that they felt was personally unfair or a deterioration of how things are supposed to be.
Err, no. Myers took Jungs work and built a test/etc. around it, validated it and so forth... MBTI theory is very much entrenched in Jung's theory, although it has evolved considerably since then.
it doesn't make logical fallacies a-okay.
Oh, interesting. Didn't Kiersey want nothing to do with that though?
you live on fallacies apparently. while i may be a prick, i'm neither dogmatic nor ignorant. i don't reject the idea of MBTI types, but i know it's not perfect either. the difference between you and i is that i can adapt and say that my type is closer to one type than other. you prefer not adapting, and you think that makes you better?
i can guarantee you i can lead better than you.
Actually, yes, someone as obtuse as yourself should quote Bugs Bunny.
It's all you are capable of understanding.
That is interesting. But your use of the word deterioration implies that "how things are supposed to be" is determined by how things were. So I stand by my claim once more, as SJ's may notice that things have changed, and they probably will not like that, but that's only because they haven't questioned the system that was there in the first place.