Jack Flak
Permabanned
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2008
- Messages
- 9,098
- MBTI Type
- type
You've failed to make a balanced questionairre. It was rather haphazard. LOLThen you're a TJ type, obviously.
You've failed to make a balanced questionairre. It was rather haphazard. LOLThen you're a TJ type, obviously.
You've failed to make a balanced questionairre. It was rather haphazard. LOL
I didn't? Who do you think I am? Now if you're done bothering me, I have work to do.It's funny that you didn't realize that it was interactive criticism of your question #2.
I know what you're getting at, and some people will obviously have a hard time deciding. But I took this into account, because I think more often than not, the people who come up with X results are the same people who will receive an improper type result from existing tests.
I could have made this a lot easier to make decisions in, but that wasn't the intention.
I've done plenty. The results of the test so far have demonstrated it's more accurate than not in differentiating, and I believe it's been improved since the last results.I think to make a more accurate questionnaire, you need to do field research on more TJ types.
Yeah, I don't care if it's accurate, obviously. Haven't been working non-stop to make it more effective.Yes, there is definitely a tradeoff between accuracy and simplicity.
Personally, I lean towards the accuracy side, but if that's not your goal, I'd say your test is pretty good.
"I can accurately judge the effectiveness of something"
"I can easily understand the purpose of a decision, object, or action"
"I quickly grasp the intended purpose and reasoning behind rules and step-by-step processes, even if I don't necessarily agree with them"
TJ? I don't think so. I'll concentrate on the second. It could almost replace 2b, because it's regarding the hypothetical, and prediction. Not acquiring knowledge, and planning."I can accurately judge the effectiveness of something"
"I can easily understand the purpose of a decision, object, or action"
"I quickly grasp the intended purpose and reasoning behind rules and step-by-step processes, even if I don't necessarily agree with it"
TJ? I don't think so. I'll concentrate on the second. It could almost replace 2b, because it's regarding the hypothetical, and prediction. Not acquiring knowledge, and planning.
You previously thought you were INFJ, right?
It seems to me that you're more likely INFJ. My test thinks so also, so...Tis true. But I was very happy being an INFP and now you've gone andit up.
That is interesting. Have you ever considered ENFJ, based on descriptions and such?Hmm. Interesting results.. I think the reflect moreso how I feel. I Believe I am ENFP, but I think I have other tendacies that show through this.
It seems to me that you're more likely INFJ. My test thinks so also, so...![]()
It seems like I mentioned that I thought INFJ for you long ago, but I can't be sure. Not based on the test per se.Based solely on your test or other indications?
As an edit: I put scheduling and I had meant the other answer.. I DO scheduling. It's not what I value ^_^b
Well it's easy to be a critic, Eileen! hehe.I hate those questions, actually. I neither value scheduling nor spontaneity specifically. I'm down with whatever the situation calls for.
That said, I never turned anything in late in college.![]()