Kingu Kurimuzon
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2013
- Messages
- 20,940
- MBTI Type
- I
- Enneagram
- 9w8
- Instinctual Variant
- sp/sx
It is understandable that there is baggage. It is unforgivable if they at least don't acknowledge it and keep working to make amends and do better.To be honest I think [MENTION=7280]Lark[/MENTION]'s right in a sense. Christianity is one of the oldest cultural structures in the world and they're going to have a laundry list of baggage. Religions in general share that. Show me any state or bureaucracy or organizational structure that has NOT committed some atrocity if it's lasted for 100 years. It's practically a prerequisite.
It is understandable that there is baggage. It is unforgivable if they at least don't acknowledge it and keep working to make amends and do better.
Moore’s letter was leaked to Religion News Service (RNS) a few weeks after he resigned from the ERLC. And on June 1, Immanuel Nashville, a church not affiliated with the Southern Baptist Convention, announced that Moore would become its pastor in residence. Which means that one of the most important figures in the SBC has completely broken with the denomination he has been a part of for virtually his entire life.
Moore’s 4,000-word letter explains why.
His departure was not primarily prompted, as many people had assumed, by his role as an outspoken critic of Donald Trump, although that had clearly upset powerful members within the politically and theologically conservative denomination. Instead, the letter suggests, the breach was caused by the stands he had taken against sexual abuse within the SBC and on racial reconciliation, which had infuriated the executive committee. The chair of the executive committee at the time, Mike Stone, is now running for SBC president. According to RNS, “Supporters have touted Moore’s resignation as proof of Stone’s effectiveness as a leader.†(Stone released a statement in response to Moore’s letter, alleging that it contained “numerous misrepresentations,†and calling it an attempt to influence the coming denominational election.)
“The presenting issue here is that, first and foremost, of sexual abuse,†Moore wrote. “This Executive Committee, through their bylaws workgroup, ‘exonerated’ churches, in a spur-of-the-moment meeting, from serious charges of sexual abuse cover-up...â€
...But confronting sexual abuse wasn’t the only issue dividing Moore from the SBC executive committee. “The other absolutely draining and unrelenting issue has been that of racial reconciliation,†Moore wrote. “My family and I have faced constant threats from white nationalists and white supremacists, including within our convention. Some of them have been involved in neo-Confederate activities going back for years. Some are involved with groups funded by white nationalist nativist organizations. Some of them have just expressed raw racist sentiment, behind closed doors.â€
Moore cited specific examples: “One SBC leader who was at the forefront of these behind-closed-doors assaults had already ripped me to shreds verbally for saying, in 2011, that the Southern Baptist Convention should elect an African-American president,†he wrote. “This same leader told a gathering that ‘The Conservative Resurgence is like the Civil War, except this time unlike the last one, the right side won.’ I walked out of that gathering, as did one of you.â€
Moore also mentioned an SBC leader who, during a discussion about Black victims of police violence, had asserted that “only those with guns would prevent black people from burning down all of our cities...â€
Hillsong Church boasts many celebrity attendees, churches in 30 countries, and an average global attendance of 150,000 people a week. But controversy and allegations of sexual abuse, homophobia, and toxic leadership have followed the megachurch since it was founded in 1983. Now, Leona Kimes, a pastor at Hillsong Boston, is coming forward about the abuse, bullying, and exploitation she faced while working for a Hillsong New York pastor. Although she did not mention disgraced Hillsong New York figurehead Carl Lentz by name, Religion News Service confirmed that he was Kimes' employer and pastor at the time.
In a May 31 statement published on Medium, Kimes wrote that she and her husband, Josh, moved to the U.S. from Sydney, Australia to help build the Australia-based megachurch's New York chapter in 2011. Today, Kimes and Josh are both pastors for Hillsong Boston, but at the time, only Josh worked as a pastor. Kimes, meanwhile, was tasked with working as a nanny, housekeeper, and personal assistant for Hillsong New York's co-founder, 42-year-old Lentz, and his wife, Laura. She says that while working in that capacity, Lentz subjected her to seven years of bullying, manipulation, and sexual abuse, and she felt powerless to speak up as Hillsong New York grew bigger and bigger...
[MENTION=7280]Lark[/MENTION], "same old same old" has to stop. Like, yesterday.
Catholic Church clergy sex abuse: Read the full grand jury report
Pennsylvania Attorney General - Grand Jury Report
Controversies surrounding the Legion of Christ - Wikipedia
AP: Catholic Church lobbied for taxpayer funds, got $1.4B
The McCarrick report | National Catholic Reporter
It is understandable that there is baggage. It is unforgivable if they at least don't acknowledge it and keep working to make amends and do better.
Yeah.
I guess I don't know what the novelty or intrigue is in interrogating the "sins and misconduct of organized religion" is and I certainly don't have 45 minutes to waste on what I figured out when I was 15. If there's anything particularly interesting the OP should pick out a highlight or a timestamp to get us discussing.
Russell Moore’s Exit From the Southern Baptist Convention - The Atlantic
Hillsong Pastor Accuses Carl Lentz Of Sex Abuse Scandal
Well, Lark's issue is that he's always feeling the need to defend the Catholic church, even when it's not even really the topic.
Mark Driscoll (featured in the video above) isn't from the Catholic church. The two articles I read this morning, incidentally, aren't about the Catholic church either. So why do Catholics keep getting dragged into the discussion? (Oh, gee, the sexual abuse scandals. Weird,huh?)
But in any case, the SBC is not nearly as old, and Hillsong and the like are much younger. But same old stuff -- abuse of power, racism, and sexual abuse / sexist behavior. Even the "young" denominations seem to exhibit the same sort of problems as their Catholic older sibling.
At best, one can say that church walls provide a safe haven and a ready-built power structure for those who would support these things; at worst, one could try to argue that there are particular tenets that contribute to a propensity of these thoughts and behaviors.
To be honest I think [MENTION=7280]Lark[/MENTION]'s right in a sense. Christianity is one of the oldest cultural structures in the world and they're going to have a laundry list of baggage. Religions in general share that. Show me any state or bureaucracy or organizational structure that has NOT committed some atrocity if it's lasted for 100 years. It's practically a prerequisite.
I don't know what's worse, the crimes we're talking about (because they are crimes, let's not mince words), or the apathy in the face of them.
It's just incomprehensible to me how anyone can adopt such a view of this.
My biggest issue is they elected Trump. Something is seriously wrong with that. No, it isn't ok to vote for such a terrible person and call youself a Christian. He is the closest thing to the antichrist that I have seen in my lifetime. Complete absolute hypocrites.
I'm going to agree. Isn't it all just routine, everyday human arrogance? There are lots of different institutions and bureaucracies struggling and trying to get their abuses under control. The church is just one among many.
But he was fighting for them and their view, that's why they voted for him. Generally they are single issue voters: total abortion abolition. To accomplish that, they needed insane authoritarian judges, including SCOTUS. Mission accomplished.
The last sounds like Nazi or other anti-Semitic propaganda. The rest is documented reality, up to the present day. It is legitimate to consider the "sins" of religion, understanding that the RCC is just one example. We can also contrast that with the good religion does, though the OP specifically focused on the negatives, much as a court case focuses on the murder the suspect is accused of, and not the fact that he supports his sick mother, or put his nephew through college.I'm sorry about whoever or whatever hurt you that has you posting stuff like that.
If you look back over what I wrote you'll see I was highlighting how tedious the whole "religion = bad" is. As it is.
Its you that mentioned the RCC, and linked it with sexual abuse too, if you've given long enough will you wheel out something about Jews drinking the blood of Christian children too?