What is a "compliment in disguise"? If brevity is the soul of wit, then perhaps rarity is the soul of compliments.
Rather an 'indirect' compliment- something that may not immediately be recognized as a compliment. I can't think of an example to explain what I mean. But since I am generally awkward with the whole exchange of giving a direct compliment and the person saying
"thank you" followed by the end of the conversation... I'd rather have a conversation with someone and through the lines I will show my appreciation for them.
I just thought of something but I am not sure if it can be even be accounted as a 'compliment' (though the thread title is
'nice things', so maybe this counts as being nice). My way of 'complimenting' someone is rather showing interest in things they enjoy/are good at; asking about their experience, what they like about it, what it means to them etc, how they did it (if it's in regard to something they made like art par example; ask them which techniques they used). I prefer to give compliments when I can add more than
'Wow that looks nice!' Even though it's genuine, it feels 'wrong'. I think they deserve more than a simple 'that looks nice'. I will try to give them a more thoughtful response- say what I like about it and why. (Though I admit that I sometimes do give 'shallow compliments' and I end up feeling bad about it because I know the person may doubt the genuineness of the compliment.)
In the regard of saying 'thank you', lately I have developed more of an 'aversion' towards both saying and receiving it (when it comes to direct compliments). When I give someone a compliment there's no reason for them to thank me- it almost makes it look as if I expect something in return because I said something nice to them. (But this is probably again because I am uncomfortable with compliments and the 'thank you' puts emphasis on it being a compliment.)
But I generally don't give fake compliments. I might give a white lie if it's only going to be helpful and not hurtful (like telling someone that the pizza they accidentally left in the oven too long isn't that bad - what's the point in getting critical then, if they already feel bad? And it's not a big deal?)
I personally don't see the purpose of white lies or how it's beneficial (or okay, I can see how it's beneficial for some people). How is being honest the same as getting critical?
One might as well just admit that the pizza has indeed been in the oven for too long- but as long as there's no black matter growing all over it we'll be fine. Who cares, everyone makes mistakes and we move on. I'd rather not make things 'prettier' than they are, accept that not everything is perfect and that it's nothing to feel bad about.
It would personally annoy me more that someone is trying to 'refute'/deny the truth (though then again whether you like pizza that's been in the oven for too long is subjective). That doesn't mean you have to point it out but if the person says something about it themself; they
know. It's most of the time (in my eyes) obvious when someone is trying to 'coddle' and isn't being completely honest. In most situations it'll get on my nerves because I have a knee-jerk reaction to prove the person wrong.
But this is just my personal preference of course. Maybe some people prefer to receive a white lie (even though they know it's not true- or maybe some people genuinely believe it. I always had the idea that everyone can in some way see through white lies but I could be wrong.)
When is the time for criticism? That seems like the best question. Much of the time, it's not needed and isn't going to be helpful. I think it's best if given kindly, is helpful, and is actually going to make a significant positive difference; or if it's directly asked for; or if it's a professional setting where it's expected.
Criticism is a negatively loaded term. I'd say that thoughtful feedback is extremely useful (and to me important in order to be able to grow as a person).
Then again- feedback is not always wanted/needed and highly depends on the situation. As an example of someone sending me a drawing they are working on with the message
'something is a bit off'. They are in my eyes, welcome to feedback and I will tell them how I think they can improve their drawing (and I will most of the time also point out what's good). The person was happy with the feedback- it made their drawing look better and I was happy to be able to help. What would have been the use of saying
'No it looks just fine' when it does in fact not- and the person knows it doesn't? Since they were not
directly asking me for feedback- but I read between the lines that they were open for it.