Peter Deadpan
phallus impudicus
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2016
- Messages
- 8,864
How could it POSSIBLY beeeEeeeEeee that 80% of a society are contently living their lives the wrong way??!!???


I do think you can get sane individuals, even if you have an insane society.
They dont last long without experiencing some sort of breakdown though.![]()
How could it POSSIBLY beeeEeeeEeee that 80% of a society are contently living their lives the wrong way??!!???
![]()
![]()
![]()
You're an idealist aren't you?
That made me laugh
- - - Updated - - -
Nawh, dont go in for that sort of metaphysics really.
You're an idealist aren't you?
This is why I found the book The Fear of Freedom and a lot of Erich Fromm's thinking about a social unconscious and social character to be so, so significant.
I discovered those books relatively late in life but I had noticed many of the things they pointed up in my experience up until then of religions, political ideologies, movements and people. I definitely had begun to believe that most of the examples of religion, ideology and movements I'd seen in the world where flags of convenience for something else.
Not, definitely not, in some sense of conspiracy theory. That's a different matter. Although not a different matter altogether because conspiracies where they exist (and I think its just straight up organised crime money more often than anything else) can be themselves a channel for the underlying social character.
The problem with this is blindspots, they exist, I've written about them on this forum before and dont especially care to go into them again but I have found huge blind spots to be exercised by individuals who believe that persecutions carried out to introduce or further their own goals are automatically justified or justifiable, kind of like it goes without saying. No one feels like taking a care about governments legislating opinion, the right to work, deliver services as a business owner etc. when it seems to be out of step with their opinions.
Anyone that is willing to surrender their personal freedom to one group of tyrants just to spite another group of them seems to possess a very warped sense of reality to me.
This idea of a government mandated morality system is about as unconstitutional as it can get. I neither want nor need a system telling me whether or not I’m a good human being and then rewarding or punishing me accordingly. Anyone that does support this madness is either part of the totalitarian regime employing it or is an absolute moron.
80% of the Chinese people like this system? I wonder what became of the 20% that stated that they didn’t?
Anyone that is willing to surrender their personal freedom to one group of tyrants just to spite another group of them seems to possess a very warped sense of reality to me.
This idea of a government mandated morality system is about as unconstitutional as it can get. I neither want nor need a system telling me whether or not I’m a good human being and then rewarding or punishing me accordingly. Anyone that does support this madness is either part of the totalitarian regime employing it or is an absolute moron.
80% of the Chinese people like this system? I wonder what became of the 20% that stated that they didn’t?
Also you sound like one of those people who gets burned at the stake or sent off for "reeducation" or "processing"
I think the best way to achieve something close to the libertarian socialist vision is to implement socialism within a democratic model.
Well the means that any social credit system is going to implemented is liable to involve privately owned firms, maybe they'll be corporations or maybe some other sort of business, state's dont often develop things like that "in house" so to speak, often if they do they are poor product for a variety of reasons.
So I think exclusive ownership by private or public agencies is just unlikely, objectively, how it operates, ie data collection, data sharing, data storage, its use in crime fighting, public projects, any other consequences, are going to have to be legally controlled and regulated, so I'd see some sort of role for an ombudsman, industry codes of conduct, even litigation but accountability is the key thing.
Its not automatically accountable if its state owned or directed any more than privately owned and directed, democratic controls of the government by the public, or even politicians, are relatively weak, as is the opposite idea of consumer sovereignty.
How could it POSSIBLY beeeEeeeEeee that 80% of a society are contently living their lives the wrong way??!!???
![]()
![]()
![]()
Anyone that is willing to surrender their personal freedom to one group of tyrants just to spite another group of them seems to possess a very warped sense of reality to me.
This idea of a government mandated morality system is about as unconstitutional as it can get. I neither want nor need a system telling me whether or not I’m a good human being and then rewarding or punishing me accordingly. Anyone that does support this madness is either part of the totalitarian regime employing it or is an absolute moron.
Fascism is right-wing totalitarianism, like the Third Reiche. I'm proposing left-wing authoritarianism as the only viable alternative. Sometimes the only way to fight fire is with fire.
.
Mao? is that you?
I am one of those people, too. Can't keep my mouth shut when it comes to some things. Hopefully we can stage an escape together [MENTION=33707]Population: 1[/MENTION]
And that is the main problem in this whole issue, democracy is evaporating everywhere and there really is nowhere to run. Which is exactly why serious mess is practically unavoidable with current trends.
The fact that most of the world blow up genuine education in critical thinking is coming to it's inevitable consequences.
Oh great, a tankie.
how Quixotic; hang in there gang, those Giants will topple yet.