Little Linguist
Striving for balance
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2008
- Messages
- 6,880
- MBTI Type
- xNFP
- Instinctual Variant
- sx/so
Well, hell, it told me I'm NF. DOH, I knew that already!!!!!!!
OK those are good things right?
I put myself as ISFJ/INFJ because I can relate to some descriptions of both of them(compared to all other types those two resemble me best)... although I do lean more towards N I think. However I don't relate to Everything that is in one or the other, it's like alittle of both... so why can't I put both of them in?I don't really see why someone has to be completely one type and expect them to be everything it describes them to be. We are not clones o.o but w/e it's not a huge deal to me >.>. I like both! so hah!
It is if you like to think of your identity as one giant venn diagram.
I personally think that's cool. To others, it might make them cry.
here's one for this thread
![]()
As one of those X people, it's not cause I really believe I'm an X because I don't. I pretty sure of my type and which function the X is supposedly replacing.
I keep an X in my profile to make other people work harder figuring out which I am (if they care to investigate). And I figure the least understood/stereotyped function on this forum is Sensing and one of the least understood temperaments is SJ. You think you know, but you have no idea. Plus sometimes I like scarring the NTPs. It's fun!![]()
An ENFx has both Ne and Fe? Ne affected by Fi and Fe affected by Ni? To be comfortable using Feeling and Intuition BOTH introverted and extroverted sounds like being a superhero to me. Are their functions more numerous albeit underdeveloped? What's the story?
Having suggested the idea to my father he is more disappointed by the usage of Xs. A person is either E or I in his book and never perfectly in the middle.Why are placeholders pointless?
And how the hell is anybody bothered by other people using the X?![]()
Having suggested the idea to my father he is more disappointed by the usage of Xs. A person is either E or I in his book and never perfectly in the middle.
I must admit to not really liking them. It seems to be an exercise in avoidance to me and I find that disconcerting. Is the person not happy with their type and hence defaces it or is it true confusion? Are they merely messing with the system? Is there a point to the X or is it just a placeholder? Why don't they just miss it out all together?
Personally I get the same kind of twinge when people insist on pronouncing h as "haitch" and not "aitch".... there again I also dislike toffee...
Having suggested the idea to my father he is more disappointed by the usage of Xs. A person is either E or I in his book and never perfectly in the middle.
I must admit to not really liking them. It seems to be an exercise in avoidance to me and I find that disconcerting. Is the person not happy with their type and hence defaces it or is it true confusion? Are they merely messing with the system? Is there a point to the X or is it just a placeholder? Why don't they just miss it out all together?
Personally I get the same kind of twinge when people insist on pronouncing h as "haitch" and not "aitch".... there again I also dislike toffee...
place holders are pointless unless its I/E because if its in the J/P spot...well that messes everything up...for example
Im and ENFP (Ne, Fi, Te, Si)
If i was and ENFJ (Fe, Ni, Se, Ti)
yes that is function notation