Personality Results – Typology Central Jung Personality Test
INTP
Ne = Ni > Fe = Ti > Te > Fi > Si = Se
Ne Ni 6
Fe Fi 0
Te -1
Fi -3
Se Si -4
Sounds about right in terms of JCFs, I tend to label myself NxTi or NxFe too.
So my results are screwy as per usual. How does your test mash functions into types? Do you think you could list second and third possibilities as well, if the results of two or three are close?
I'll mull over the while shebang and think about suggestions and all later.
Also Round 2. Fight!
Personality Results – Typology Central Jung Personality Test
INFJ
Introverted Intuitive Feeling Judging
The order of preference for your cognitive functions appears to be
Ni > Ne > Fe > Fi = Ti > Te = Se > Si
Ni 8
Ne 3
Fe 1
Ti -1
Te -2
Se -2
Si -6
To compare
Ni = Ne > Fe = Ti > Te > Fi > Se = Si
vs
Ni > Ne > Fe > Ti = Fi > Te = Se > Si
For the "is equal to" ones in both of these, I reordered how they were presented to more closely match one another in terms of how they were presented, since I'm assuming that, say, Si = Se is the same as Se = Si.
Note of course that my answers weren't exactly the same as last time, not on purpose. I took it fresh not trying to remember what I put last time. So if you're looking to see how the logic changed based on my results, that's a confounding factor.
So as I've pegged myself, most of the time, this basically all points to Nx > Ti = Fe. That's in line with top contenders from everyone else and myself being ENxP and xNFJ over the past 10 years.
Basically what I'm saying is that messy fringe cases like mine don't really need an answer. But a list of 2-3 possibilities at the end fit oddball results like mine might help.
BTW one thing I noticed is that the "Definitely not me" and "Definitely me" are flipped around in some of the questions. That's good if you want to randomize possible answers to control for the order of the factors on your results, but not so good if your subjects are going to assume consistency there. Clicking "Definitely me" instead of "Definitely not me" would of course maybe lead to some possibly large inconsistencies.