Doctor Cringelord
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2013
- Messages
- 20,615
- MBTI Type
- I
- Enneagram
- 9w8
- Instinctual Variant
- sp/sx
I think Elia is describing TradFems.
That's just your semantics though.
I think a lot of people who identify as atheists are actually agnostics.
No, its not just my semantics. Webster defines atheism as "the belief that no god exists". Of course, dictionary defintions tell you little about the social themes behind a belief, but thats also true of the dictionary's definition of feminism.
Where? I just checked a few big dictionaries and they are all saying "not theism", which includes both belief in an absence and absence of belief, like I said, since they are both not theism. They use the term "disbelief" which is equivalent to lack of belief, if slightly stronger because it implies they are at least aware of the concept.
Probably, by the technical definition of it. Most secular humanists I know simply feel there is no proof of any kind of higher pwoer, and thats that. I do know some that negate the belief in god entirely, however.
I used to label atheist but then I realized it wasn't that I didn't believe in God, it was really that I don't care too much one way or the other.
I find that answer is also better for sending away "have you heard the word" recruiters. If you answer, "yes, and not interested," they usually get the idea quicker than if you answered "no"
I learned that approach also worked better when asked if I was a feminist in the past.
I used to label atheist but then I realized it wasn't that I didn't believe in God, it was really that I don't care too much one way or the other.
I find that answer is also better for sending away "have you heard the word" recruiters. If you answer, "yes, and not interested," they usually get the idea quicker than if you answered "no"
I learned that approach also worked better when asked if I was a feminist in the past.
Lol. Who asked you if you were a feminist? Thats never hapened to me, lol.
Webster's New Encycopedic Dictionary, 1993, says "atheism: The belief that there is no God: denial of the existence of a supreme being"
I used to label atheist but then I realized it wasn't that I didn't believe in God, it was really that I don't care too much one way or the other.
Being atheist is not a negative. It is the belief no god exists, so its a positive. If they had said "agnostic" they might've had a point.
You misquoted me and now it looks like I insulted atheists :/
I don't think that is modern feminism. The whole point of feminism seems to be about letting women choose whatever kind of lifestyle they prefer rather than box them into one role. I don't think modern feminists would praise any kind of "women should..." statements because people shouldn't have to live their lives a certain way because of their gender.
Modern feminists don't think it's wrong for men to say "you look nice today" to a woman, but modern feminists do have a problem with men catcalling women.
To me it seems like you've had the misfortune of running into quite a few radical feminists, but I think most people who identify as feminist in this day & age don't align themselves with this kind of thinking. Even SJWs on Tumblr aren't bad like they're made out to be, but the troll accounts are sensationalized everywhere else because people take it seriously.
it looks like I insulted atheists :/
What [MENTION=26919]EliaBlack[/MENTION] said IS a part of feminism. Whether they are radfems or moderate, if they are self-labeling? They are a part of it. You cannot separate them no matter how much you want to make it look prettier.
Maybe you don't have to take the whole, on a personal level. I get that.
To each their own but negating those extreme voices as "we're not really like that" is a convenient way to not own the bad with the good. Especially, when it's so easy to find the bad/rad ones.
I would hope you mean, "I'm not like that" because that is all you can speak for.
My 2 cents.