SearchingforPeace
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2015
- Messages
- 5,821
- MBTI Type
- ENFJ
- Enneagram
- 9w8
- Instinctual Variant
- sx/so
I have been thinking a lot about function development recently and a recent discussion with another member helped me put some ideas together. I hope it makes a little sense.
Introduction
As we know (or believe we know), we each have 4 functions, each with a direction or aspect. We use two to judge and two to perceive.
By conventional JCF stacking, my type as a ENFJ is Fe Ni Se Ti. Various theorists have also discussed the shadow aspect of each, the inverse.
Now, I do believe the combination is very important, making a ESFJ and a ENFJ different, though both are Fe doms, for example. Fe Si and Fe Ni will arrive at different places with the same experience.
Additionally, functions are on an axis, Fe/Ti, Fi/Te, Ni/Se, Si/Ne, so that there is a relationship between the judging functions and the perceiving functions.
In typical understanding, we develop our dominant than our secondary then our tertiary and the inferior is a place of weakness and growth.
Personality Junkie — INFJ, INTP, INTJ, INFP Types & More talks that instead we actually develop our inferior next after the dominant. The author's point is that the dominant and inferior are tied together(the axis) and there is a battle for control between the two in the late teens and early twenties, before things settle down. The inferior is then subsumed into the dominant.
At The Personality Page they talk about growth for types is often turning judgment to the opposite, i.e., FJs need to look inside themselves and FPs need to extend feeling outward.
There is also talk of an 8 function model, but that is more about acknowledging the shadow and each function exists, with the other direction just hidden in our subconscious.
Naomi Quenk wrote for the official MBTI folks for a long time and had access to a mountain of data. She constructed her theory of in the grip typing, which seems to be a great way to narrow down a type.
My new idea
Ok, enough of the background and theory, where am I going?
What if type development is all that and more? What if trying to focus on the inferior function development is fundementally hopeless? After all, the Fe for a ISTP will remain weak even if fully developed.
So, why not instead look to the shadows of our Dom and Aux functions for growth? If the shadow of our Dominant is just as strong as our Dominant, shouldn't getting a handle on that be more important than trying to work on an Inf that will always be weak and has been largely subsumed into the Dominant?
For the ISTP example, they would try to getting better at Te stuff, fitting in the system and using their internal thinking combined with their Ti.
Likewise, the ENFJ would try to develop shadow Fi (which isn't a separate function, but just turning Fe inward) rather than Ti.
In my own life, I have spent a lot of time sitting with feelings and emotions, trying to focus on myself internally, to find the deep and scary places that INFPs live in all the time.
The experience has been extremely painful but rewarding. My shadow does not feel so terrifying. And it seems clear that the abyss that Fe doms enter while in the grip is a little bit of inferior Ti and a lot of shadow Fe.
A ENFJ will never wield shadow Fi like a INFP, but it can become useful and less terrifying. (a special thanks to my discussion partner for coming up with that point).
Anyway, I would love to see what others think about this idea.
Introduction
As we know (or believe we know), we each have 4 functions, each with a direction or aspect. We use two to judge and two to perceive.
By conventional JCF stacking, my type as a ENFJ is Fe Ni Se Ti. Various theorists have also discussed the shadow aspect of each, the inverse.
Now, I do believe the combination is very important, making a ESFJ and a ENFJ different, though both are Fe doms, for example. Fe Si and Fe Ni will arrive at different places with the same experience.
Additionally, functions are on an axis, Fe/Ti, Fi/Te, Ni/Se, Si/Ne, so that there is a relationship between the judging functions and the perceiving functions.
In typical understanding, we develop our dominant than our secondary then our tertiary and the inferior is a place of weakness and growth.
Personality Junkie — INFJ, INTP, INTJ, INFP Types & More talks that instead we actually develop our inferior next after the dominant. The author's point is that the dominant and inferior are tied together(the axis) and there is a battle for control between the two in the late teens and early twenties, before things settle down. The inferior is then subsumed into the dominant.
At The Personality Page they talk about growth for types is often turning judgment to the opposite, i.e., FJs need to look inside themselves and FPs need to extend feeling outward.
There is also talk of an 8 function model, but that is more about acknowledging the shadow and each function exists, with the other direction just hidden in our subconscious.
Naomi Quenk wrote for the official MBTI folks for a long time and had access to a mountain of data. She constructed her theory of in the grip typing, which seems to be a great way to narrow down a type.
My new idea
Ok, enough of the background and theory, where am I going?
What if type development is all that and more? What if trying to focus on the inferior function development is fundementally hopeless? After all, the Fe for a ISTP will remain weak even if fully developed.
So, why not instead look to the shadows of our Dom and Aux functions for growth? If the shadow of our Dominant is just as strong as our Dominant, shouldn't getting a handle on that be more important than trying to work on an Inf that will always be weak and has been largely subsumed into the Dominant?
For the ISTP example, they would try to getting better at Te stuff, fitting in the system and using their internal thinking combined with their Ti.
Likewise, the ENFJ would try to develop shadow Fi (which isn't a separate function, but just turning Fe inward) rather than Ti.
In my own life, I have spent a lot of time sitting with feelings and emotions, trying to focus on myself internally, to find the deep and scary places that INFPs live in all the time.
The experience has been extremely painful but rewarding. My shadow does not feel so terrifying. And it seems clear that the abyss that Fe doms enter while in the grip is a little bit of inferior Ti and a lot of shadow Fe.
A ENFJ will never wield shadow Fi like a INFP, but it can become useful and less terrifying. (a special thanks to my discussion partner for coming up with that point).
Anyway, I would love to see what others think about this idea.