The only post I admit was hostile was the one in your wisdom of e7 thread. Everything else I've said to you was tongue-in-cheek as well, but kept getting misconstrued (I do a lot of sarcastic humor). I recall talking to you about this at the time, and you said you were ok with it (rather, you thought I was the one who was offended).... I've never had this issue with anyone except for you... This recent post you are responding to is type related criticism of how I see you in relation to the enneagram. I see you do this to other people all the time, calling it how you see it, and not always respectfully, so I figured you'd be able to take what you dish out. wtf?
I did not connect you to the Seeker thread because of 469. I connected you to that thread because your pattern and reactions are similar to the member that was participating in that thread. I was hoping you would be able to see a connection between you and that member. You have twisted my intentions again. I was able consider your typing of me and even your typing of others, despite major disagreements, yet you respond by reacting with "oh like, you're not getting it." You see the irony here? You accuse me of projection, in which I will respond with "fair enough maybe," yet what about your reactions and accusations? You seem to just write it off. I don't think it's enough to pawn all this off to a 6 wing. I think you're a core 6. You do that thing where you bounce around and poke defenses. When they poke back, you have the nerve to get upset and claim you're just joking I don't get it. This attitude and style is pretty much how the 6w7s in my life operate.
For someone who runs around typing people and running your mouth under the pretense of "helping," I'd figure you have thicker skin. I'm hoping this is just one big "tongue-and-cheek" excuse you've concocted. If not, then I guess I'm wrong about your gut fix as well.