Florence Atley
New member
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2015
- Messages
- 44
- MBTI Type
- INFJ
- Enneagram
- 4w5
- Instinctual Variant
- sp
Hmmm... I'm not sure I quote people or use personal experiences in the context of debating.
So, when I'm most in my element, I'm debating with flexible thinkers who discuss theoretical possibilities and then tentatively choose the one that seems most likely, rather than thinking in terms of absolute truths. In that case, I persuade by discussing how my reasoning is the most likely to lead to the desired outcome. I use lots of analogies and stuff based on other principles to show how I see the situation playing out, and then suggest my opinion of the most effective solution. (what is your opinion - if this makes any sense whatsoever - does this sound like Si Se Ni Ne?)
Unfortunately, I tend to be surrounded by people who think in theoretical absolutes (definitely not positivism, which would be easier) based on purely logical deduction. Anything besides logical deduction (especially my metaphors, assumptions and comparisons to other things) is usually seen by them as flawed reasoning. Logical thinking and deduction is what I'd like to grow in, I'm just not sure what the best way is to go about it.
So, when I'm most in my element, I'm debating with flexible thinkers who discuss theoretical possibilities and then tentatively choose the one that seems most likely, rather than thinking in terms of absolute truths. In that case, I persuade by discussing how my reasoning is the most likely to lead to the desired outcome. I use lots of analogies and stuff based on other principles to show how I see the situation playing out, and then suggest my opinion of the most effective solution. (what is your opinion - if this makes any sense whatsoever - does this sound like Si Se Ni Ne?)
Unfortunately, I tend to be surrounded by people who think in theoretical absolutes (definitely not positivism, which would be easier) based on purely logical deduction. Anything besides logical deduction (especially my metaphors, assumptions and comparisons to other things) is usually seen by them as flawed reasoning. Logical thinking and deduction is what I'd like to grow in, I'm just not sure what the best way is to go about it.