You realize that you just demonized every type stacking that isn't your own, right?
Hey, hey now; not everyone with inferior Ti does, uh .. ... whatever this thread is.
every? no, just the materialistic instincts.
and i think every instinct has two versions of being, the unhealthy, which is the dark side of said instinct and healthy, the good side of it. although the evil instincts have this reversed, they become good instead of evil when unhealthy, and the opposite when healthy.
I wish it was mine. Somehow the idea tickles me fancy. Ah, one could wish... I don't care that [MENTION=5684]Elfboy[/MENTION] thinks sp/sx is more vampiric. Sx/sp is too evil for you!
"Also, thinking of sx/sp as evil makes more sense than so/sp due to the dark intensity sx/sp can take."
well yeah, so sp's think its evil and so does unhealthy sx sp's. (they pretend to be so sp's in behaviour when unhealthy, although this always happens unintentionally.)
True..
I'm not saying all inferior Ti-s do whatever "this" is.. but, I don't see "this" coming out of any other function. Could be wrong, but I rather doubt that I'm off the mark.
yet again, im hundred percent certain im an infj.
"uhuh..and your certainty about your type, fraught with misunderstandings, oversimplifications, gross misjudgement and good ol' irrationality, means a lot. "
well, sure its impossible to present the deepest of findings in a clear way without using unconscious communication which just happens to be off limits here.
"
(B) The good don't
do evil...they just
think evil, only once in a while, and "imaginatively hurt" other people. And despite this they continue to be good, because...? Let me guess, because the handbook to good and evil instincts (which, I believe, you have authored) declared them good.
So, it's just you and your ridiculous notions waltzing about on this forum."
its simple, the good siders are good from their heart and souls, we want to do the good thing even if we fail to do it. and the evil siders "good" side is that they are productive. just like yin yang described.
"Let's just conclude it all by saying "You don't know what the hell you're talking about" and stop it at that. kthxbai."
um really, like what is wrong with my theory? its perfect, realistic, acutely accurate and everything. ill stand by it.
i dont quite understand how you could not be convinced by it, its after all a deep truth about reality even if its impossible to fit so much information into mere words.