Totenkindly
@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2007
- Messages
- 52,151
- MBTI Type
- BELF
- Enneagram
- 594
- Instinctual Variant
- sx/sp
Well, one difference I can think of is thatPerhaps those differences are meaningless but I like to think they aren't.Rick doesn't keep the heads of his zombified enemies alive in glass tanks, make people participate in the WWE for zombies, or keep a little girl zombie pet in a cage so he can brush her hair until her scalp falls off.
Lol. Good point... although
the girl zombie is his daughter. At that point, he's just a man who can't let go of his attachments, rather than just sadistically just imprisoning a random zombie. Herschel kind of had the same problem, and he's a decent man (I think).
I mean, I do agree intuitively that I think they are different, but their circles have begun to intersect to some degree even if they might never superimpose. Rick is not the same idealist Rick we saw through some of Season 2, I think things started to really change for him when that barn door was opened in mid-season.
Both men do act in utilitarian fashion and have the tribal loyalty, but along with when you have said here:
My opinion is that with Rick we are seeing what happens to a person with a decently functioning moral compass when he's subjected to extreme terror and grief over an extended period of time. With the Governor we're seeing what happens to someone who is only a good citizen because of legal/civil boundaries, not moral ones, when those legal/civil boundaries fall away (worse if he then gets a chance to set the next set of legal/civil boundaries himself).
I would also say that
while Rick did do some crappy things, such as almost executing the two inmates without proof they had opened the prison doors to let in the zombies, and far worse is when he jammed his fist into Moshanne's wound as part of interrogating her, he quickly relented when he realized things had gotten out of control and they wouldn't work. On a pragmatic level, he was "shifting strategies" just as the Governor did, but I feel that underneath Rick doesn't like being who he has become at times, he just feels he has no choice and would rather let himself become horrible to keep his people safe, if that is the cost.
Meanwhile, while some of the Governor's behavior overlaps, it's like you said where they are both approaching each other from different sides of things. The Governor also shifted gears when interrogating Maggie, for example, to get what he wanted from her and Glenn. But he didn't stop himself, like Rick did, and find a more respectful way to negotiate; he just did what he wanted to get the information from them. True, he could have murdered/killed them after and didn't, but what he did as the "good cop" I found pretty despicable... and I don't really think he "hates who he has become" like Rick does at this point. He never crosses the line because he's already on the other side.
Meanwhile, while some of the Governor's behavior overlaps, it's like you said where they are both approaching each other from different sides of things. The Governor also shifted gears when interrogating Maggie, for example, to get what he wanted from her and Glenn. But he didn't stop himself, like Rick did, and find a more respectful way to negotiate; he just did what he wanted to get the information from them. True, he could have murdered/killed them after and didn't, but what he did as the "good cop" I found pretty despicable... and I don't really think he "hates who he has become" like Rick does at this point. He never crosses the line because he's already on the other side.
I expect in the mid-season finale to see Andrea having to make a choice, which will end up further defining her character for good or bad.
I think she hasn't seen that the Governor is a 'slimeball' because he has aspects that she naturally resonates with. It's easy to see someone is a slimeball when their aspects don't mesh as naturally with yours. That's why I think, if she finds out what happened to Glenn, then her character is on the line -- at that point, she'll show her own character without any confusion. (AKA, is she loyal to her friends and willing to give up her own wants to help them, or will she sell out for what she personally wants, with someone who is morally dubious at best?)
I also wonder what's going to happen between Merle and Darryl. Merle hasn't changed; Darryl has deepened; this could be quite the mess.