RaptorWizard
Permabanned
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2012
- Messages
- 5,895
- MBTI Type
- INTJ
- Enneagram
- 5w6
- Instinctual Variant
- sx/so
I copied this title from the thread greenfairy started by simply replacing the usernames, and also I know greenfairy has had multiple type me threads, so I figure I can do the same.
Anyway, I was considering retyping as eNTp, but then an anonymous individual was telling me how something termed "INTJ Omnipotence" was rather amusing!
And then also, lots of folks also think I'm an ITP, either one.
Of course though, perhaps some of you actually don't think I'm an INTP, ISTP, ENTP, or INTJ, so please folks don't hesitate to vote. It would be greatly appreciated. Your opinions fellow forum members I hold to be of inestimable value.
Then, as far as enneagram goes I have rarely, if ever, seen enneagrams other than 5 and 7 suggested for me so, since only 20 voted are allowed, the only enneagrams on the list will be 5w4, 5w6, 7w6, and 7w8.
By the way, I'm allowing multiple voting choices, the votes are going to be made public, I'm putting the poll options in order of how likely I hold them to possibly be true and also, I'm adding enneagram options to the poll so, since you can cast votes for more than one option please also, along with your MBTI vote, cast an enneagram vote as well.
So, all of that being said, let me know what you think, assuming it's worth your time. Thanks folks and good day!
Lastly, I'm particularly curious as to what the following forum members think my type is: @<a href="http://www.typologycentral.com/forums/member.php?u=15392" target="_blank">AffirmitiveAnxiety</a> @<a href="http://www.typologycentral.com/forums/member.php?u=15773" target="_blank">greenfairy</a> @<a href="http://www.typologycentral.com/forums/member.php?u=16748" target="_blank">Il Morto Che Parla</a> @<a href="http://www.typologycentral.com/forums/member.php?u=15886" target="_blank">jontherobot</a> @<a href="http://www.typologycentral.com/forums/member.php?u=13589" target="_blank">Mal+</a> @<a href="http://www.typologycentral.com/forums/member.php?u=6164" target="_blank">Riva</a> (consider yourselves the chosen!)
edit -
As usual, I could be wrong, though to me, as of right now, this typing I have just assigned to myself seems to me to be the best possible conclusion.
edit - I see I shall continually question myself in a perpetual cycle, as I am now seriously beginning to doubt this INTP typing, seeing that my congition may not fall into that category, even if the behaviors I display appear to so, I am definately going to need more information before making an unalterable judgment on what type I am.
Those who type by behavior I believe to be followers of Keirsey, and those who type by functions I believe to be followers of Jung. I also think that our Jungian type should also fall in line with our Keirsian type, though whether you jump from behavior to functions, or from functions to behavior is a tough call.
Personally though, I would trust a functional analysis more than a behavioral analysis, since behaviors can fluctuate from person to person at different phases throughout their life, though the control center of their actions, the constructs of their minds, remain the same, at least in their general blueprints, and even within these blueprints, perhaps there are behavioral plans A for one situation, B for another, and so forth. Maybe the plans can even be altered according to changing circumstances. It is because of this that I think of personality as more of a contingency plan than a static system.
Also, as a last point, I would like to say that perhaps the preliminary designs of our personalities differ from the continually changing constructions of our minds, hence there could be some transformations in our behaviors as well as our thinking.
Any further input on my little typology theory presented above, as well as on my type, would be greatly appreciated.
edit - I've finally decided that I'm not logical enough to be an NT or a 5, but I am active enough to be an SP or a 7, so my type is: ISTP 7w8 so/sp.
edit - greenfairy here made a very interesting case for INFJ:
edit - Skylights also made a very interesting case for ENTP:I confess I'm still really tempted to posit INFJ for you. The only flaw is that you seem to lack a pronounced sense of empathy and social harmony; but that could be due to being in a tertiary loop, with Fe not developed due to Asperger's and the social conditioning of the male gender to prefer Thinking.
Ni gives you the ability to connect ideas and generate complex combinations of ideas, as well as the ability to reconcile paradoxes into consistencies; Fe gives you a sense of relationship between your existence and the rest of existence (clearly you feel this, because you have a notion of mastering creation); Ti gives you the ability to be detached (and ignore your Fe) and to assimilate your collected ideas into logical form; and developed Se balances Ni and gives you the impression that you are ISTP.
But don't worry, I haven't voted yet.
You may argue and swear up and down that you lack feeling and that it is weakness; but I don't see anything consistent replacing it. Your Ti type thoughts and theories are subservient to your nebulous Ni notions. I don't really see any independent Ti in you; it's all tied to a deeper sort of meaning. IXTP's in contrast frequently use the Ti function in response to anything, without any sort of connection to any bigger ideas. It seems likely to me that you must suppress your feeling function to use your Ti; this would mean that effective and developed use of your functions would result in incorporation of Fe concepts which the Ti concepts support, all of which support Ni theories. Ni<Fe<Ti<Se.
And it's ok to be INFJ. It's an awesome type, which gives superpowers!
Hypothesis:
You're constantly compiling a grand theory of everything in the external universe, your cosmology. It's so important to you that it's in your sig and you constantly cite it on the site. But you string in and allude to the fun and levity in it too... speaking of, even your avatar sort of suggests that you're trying to mush everything together at once. You speak almost pure abstraction at the beginning of your video, when you're sort of putting on a show, but then when you get more serious at the very end it's fascinating because your more goal-oriented communication style comes out and you still use words like "transform, evolve, become, static, dynamic, cause, effect, control", etc, so it's pretty clear that you're really an NT. It's clearly your native communication style, though you exaggerate it for dramatics/fun. Like [MENTION=14857]fia[/MENTION] said, you do exhibit that mischief so characteristic of ENTP. You believe in a grand scheme of external connections (Ne) and an inner structure of control (Ji) that allows manipulation of the external. But you don't actually have a host of specific, fixed plans for the external (a la NTJ); you've never really gotten into that. That's not what captures your interest. You're more interested in the exploration and linking of the external than how to order the external. It's not about achieving your own goals, is it? You just want to have every possibility open to you? And they're not concrete possibilities, either, they're abstract possibilities. It's the idea of it that compels you. That's the whole point of becoming the Master of Creation, isn't it? To have every possibility available to you. If this is true, Ne dominance is certain.
I think this is possibly why you're coming off INTJ but communicate like an INTP. You're really Perceiving dominant, but you are indeed NTP. We're all hearing Master of Creation and thinking that means you actually want control, but if my thought here is right, you are really after "mastery" for the sake of keeping your options open. Which would in fact make you both an ENTP and a 7.
If this is wrong, well, it was a thought.![]()
Last edited: