A
Does it really matter, toots?
You already voted for every kind other than NTJ just to fuck with the results.
Fuckin NFPs always screwing up polls...
Why not just ISFP?
Or even ESFP?
Now now, calm that decidedly unkingly NTJ "intense and quick" temper.
This NFP intentionally abstained from voting due to compunction over whether her inclinations were truly objective, fair and not self-serving.
Meanwhile in the NTJ camp, you attempted to utilize fear-mongering in order to sway the polls by decrying that voting for an NFJ was a vote for Hitler, all the while advocating eugenics in white font.
Because ESFP kings have a hunka hunka lot of love. They aren't Nero. They are Elvis. Hell, even the Burger King.
Ok, but why not ISFP...
We do quite well, thank you. The speedbump, on the other hand . . . history.It's good to see how well INTJs do in the field when their searing vision of the future hits a speedbump.
Wagnerian indulgence (sorry if that sounds confusing. Can't think of a better way of putting it).
[MENTION=8936]highlander[/MENTION]: i request that parameters be set for this fantasy kingdom. what is going on politically with this country. is it a time of peace and prosperity or is nero burning rome and we need to rebuild a crumbling empire?
ty
You cant ask those types of questions. Its one king, one type...period. Come rain or shine
I would say that the most important time for an INTJ would be either at the founding, or at a moment of crisis when everything needs to be overhauled. During other periods of history, other types could be just as good, if not better, to have as kings. I, personally, think Reagan was an ENFJ, and talk about the ability to bring peoples' spirits back after a really shitty decade-plus -- an INTJ couldn't really pull that one off. I think in bland moments of history, where nothing much is really happening, or at least society is functioning well, and nothing really needs to be overhauled, an ISTJ would actually make a great king. Frankly, if I could vote again, I'd probably add them in there, too. I'm amazed at how little love they're getting. Fucking George Washington and Dwight Eisenhower were ISTJs, and I don't know a single American with anything bad to say about them.
Speaking of which, Nero was probably an ENTJ, who sunk into his ISFP side. When it goes bad, it goes really bad.
Same thing with Commodus in the movie Gladiator.
I think this thread is not about which type makes a great leader, but which type makes a great king. There is a difference.
You don't need alot of intelligence to be a great king. All you need to do is tell everyone the divine right of kings, and execute anyone who disagree with you. If you had those qualities, you will make a good king.
And the straw that broke the camel's back was really me saying that this guy has no place to speak about other peoples' intelligence?
don't need alot of intelligence to be a great king. All you need to do is tell everyone the divine right of kings, and execute anyone who disagree with you. If you had those qualities, you will make a good king.
You just need to be smart enough to surround yourself with good advisors, and follow their advice. I have read that Eisenhower was especially good at this.You don't need alot of intelligence to be a great king. All you need to do is tell everyone the divine right of kings, and execute anyone who disagree with you. If you had those qualities, you will make a good king.
You just need to be smart enough to surround yourself with good advisors, and follow their advice. I have read that Eisenhower was especially good at this.
Why, because I disagree with your view that NTJs makes the best king, and we should all suck your dick?
EPs ability is different then EJs. EJs are based on advisors knowledge/expertise. An EPs ability is based on adaptability of those around them. IJs are based on internal knowledge, and IP on internal adaptability.
This is all very suspect.
And I would go so far as to say that the last sentence should actually be in reverse.