LOL, the Feelers are fat.
Haphazzard:
This basic area always remains in the same proportion. With endomorphs the section below the waist is larger than the section above the waist. With mesomorphs the section above the waist is larger than the section below the waist.
Haphazzard:
This basic area always remains in the same proportion.
With endomorphs the section below the waist is larger than the section above the waist.
With mesomorphs the section above the waist is larger than the section below the waist.
This figure is calculated along with height to determine the degree of ectomorphy.
Weight becomes significant as an indicator of somatotype usually in mid 20's to early 30's because a clear trend is evident.
Most americans eat a bad diet. The american diet is especially bad for endomorphs. But they are lucky enough to get reminders about their diet from their weight.
Ectomorphs may keep their weight down on french fries and pizza but the inflamation, joint problems, migraines, high blood pressure, arterial plaque take their toll pretty much out of sight.
Ok, so if my torso is long, like, from the top of my shoulders to my waist is long, but from my waist to my crotch is short, that is a general indication that I'm a meso?
Tilty Red: Not necessarily. It's not just the length it involves the area as it it can be determined on a photograph.
![]()
This photo shows the two areas that have to be considered. The top is the thoracic trunk and the bottom is the abdominal trunk.
Haphazzard:
Forget about fat for a minute. Fat and muscle comes and goes but it doesn't change the somatotype. Your anatomical waist doesn't change. It is a line that divides the trunk midway between the bottom of the rib cage and the top of the pelvis. The base of the trunk - is basically the bony structure generally referred to as "crotch". (Heh-Heh He said bony structure). The top of the trunk is defined by the point where the neck joins the trunk over to a point that bisects the arc of the shoulders.
This basic area always remains in the same proportion. With endomorphs the section below the waist is larger than the section above the waist. With mesomorphs the section above the waist is larger than the section below the waist.
This figure is calculated along with height to determine the degree of ectomorphy.
Weight becomes significant as an indicator of somatotype usually in mid 20's to early 30's because a clear trend is evident.
Most americans eat a bad diet. The american diet is especially bad for endomorphs. But they are lucky enough to get reminders about their diet from their weight. Ectomorphs may keep their weight down on french fries and pizza but the inflamation, joint problems, migraines, high blood pressure, arterial plaque take their toll pretty much out of sight.
-- I mean, except button up shirts![]()
Haphazard said:Then naturally I must be a mesomorph because of my gigantic breasts.
That's interesting because I identify with ENFJ mostly.Pitselah:
Without a photograph you probably are in the area of a Endo 2 Meso 2 Ecto 3.5
This would be close to the 3,3,5 area on the chart splitting you between INTP and INTJ and even possibly slightly ENTP
Halfjillhalfjack:
Once again I have to begin this with a disclaimer. I can't know your actual somatotype without a proper somatotype photo. In some cases weight and height and age can come quite close. In your case:
You could be a Endo 5.5 Meso 3 Ecto 1.5 Balance 4.0
This would put you in the INFJ territory.
Your boyfriends situation is a little more ambiguous because his weight could be either from mesomorphy in which case he would be an ESFP or his weight could be from endomorphy which would be ENFP.
So, uh
Has anyone pointed out that this could be a valid categorization system if he interprets the dichotomies' definitions differently in his system?
And that MBTI, Jungian typology, Keirsey, and Socionics* also all use the same category and dichotomy names but have differing interpretations of their meaning?
So.. one could be a particular MBTI type but be a different type under this system. ... .. ....?
*aside from the subtle nuances in Socionics