INTPc shows that nature abhors a vacuum in a social group. There you can see INTPs filling the roles of Extroverts, Sensors, Feelers, and Judgers to varying degrees.
This is a very good observation, I hadn't thought of quite putting it in that way.
I also think well-adjusted INTPs admit to themselves that they are capable of such unsavory things -- they don't scorn those other functions, but come to terms with them and eventually get some good out of them.
Yes it is the more Fe-developed (and Si-devloped though they are less keen to acknowledge this), i.e. older, setlled, INTP's who are the "in-crowd" at INTPc. I don't find that bad especially, but it just means that the "in-crowd" are basically middle-aged middle class folk in the US. The level of in-jokes, again, aren't a terrible thing, but I just can't relate to the world they reference.
The other side of the coin is that the younger folk tend to be pseudo-intellectual in the extreme and not very good at referencing themselves externally, in fact they often reject this as "sensorish" and will call you such

, and have an extremely elitist contempt for the masses. But there are not many with a real interest in anthropology/sociology and a desire to be a real intelelctual, i..e. critiquing the world around you, but as a constructive, engaged member of it.
So we have a forum of settled, content middle classes on the one hand, and the angry but hermitic children of the middle classes on the other, and I think these are two sides to the same coin. There is a saying in politics that says "scratch a sectarian and you find an opportunist"...I don't know how understandable this is to others here, but I think it applies.
This is a shame as INTP's have the personality type conductive to being an intellectual, but so few use it. But at TypoC I have found many more people with a neither misanthropic, nor completely adapted, approach to the world, but rather one of engaged, constructive criticism. I like that.
