What other types have you tested as?

[Giggly]

....Besides what we know you to be here?

First time I took the MBTI, I tested ESFP, then ISFJ twice after that.

PS - Sorry if this thread is in the wrong section. Mods please feel free to move it to wherever you think it belongs.

[Magic Poriferan]

Once in a blue moon, a test will make me an INTJ. It's so rare, though, and I personally think it's quite evident that I'm not. I actually noted that I'm more likely to get the INTJ result if I'm being self-conscious about my answers.

I've gotten some other results, but they have always been from unconventional tests. The conclusion that I was an ENFP, or the strong possibility that I was an ENFJ, were probably the wierdest results I ever got. But again, they were not normal MBTI tests.

[Giggly]

I suck at this stuff and I'm new here, so take what I say with a grain of salt but what I have read from you, you definitely seem like you have a fair amount of F going on there.

[Jeffster]

First test I ever took, in Please Understand Me, I got IxFP. The N and S were tied exactly. I was a teenager then, though, and I think possibly my youthful idealism played a factor.

Recently, I have taken a few online tests that have given me an ESFP result, but I think that's due to the way the questions are asked.

[Magic Poriferan]

I suck at this stuff and I'm new here, so take what I say with a grain of salt but what I have read from you, you definitely seem like you have a fair amount of F going on there.

I've heard that plenty of times, my lady.
The fact is, no normal MBTI test has ever given me F as a result. However, raw function tests put my Fi and Ti essentially tied, and my Te one step above my Fe. So, I'm pretty well balanced on my T and F.

[Giggly]

I've heard that plenty of times, my lady.
The fact is, no normal MBTI test has ever given me F as a result. However, raw function tests put my Fi and Ti essentially tied, and my Te one step above my Fe. So, I'm pretty well balanced on my T and F.

Ahh, okay. Where can I read something about Fi/Ti/Fe etc.? I keep seeing those things being referred to all over this forum and all I can think to do is start singing a "Sound of Music" tune. lol

[Kasper]

Besides my true type I get a combination of ISTJ, INFJ and INTP, I actually don't get INTJ very often. Guess the only thing the tests know about me is that I'm definitely introverted.

[Thursday]

ISTJ-INTJ-ENFJ-ISFJ

[SillySapienne]

ENFP-ENFP-ENFP-INFP-ENFP-ENFP-ENFP-ENFP-INFP-ENFP-ENFP-ENFP.

[Magic Poriferan]

Ahh, okay. Where can I read something about Fi/Ti/Fe etc.? I keep seeing those things being referred to all over this forum and all I can think to do is start singing a "Sound of Music" tune. lol

All of that is a reference to Jung's Cognitive Functions. It's extremely helpful stuff to know if you want to understand how this system works. In a lot of ways, I prefer using the functions directly more than the MBTI itself.

This is a pretty good place to start with.
Jungian Function Theory

This is also a good place to look at, though it talks in terms of people as "types", it's still basically describing the qualities of each othe functions.
Tracking, Vol. I, Chapter 1

My main peeve regarding descriptions of the functions is that Introverted functions often get described in an esoteric ways. It happens to Intuition sometimes as well. As a result, of all the functions, Introverted Intuition seems the most prone to getting unhelpful, mumbo-jumbo descriptions.

Of course, if you are really curious about this stuff, I wouldn't have and problem with personally explaning it to you in a private conversation.