Giggly
No moss growing on me
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2008
- Messages
- 9,661
- MBTI Type
- iSFj
- Enneagram
- 2
- Instinctual Variant
- sx/so
Can we get more pics of Si in here? Se is fairly clear to me. I think mal is correct when he says that Si is concerned with the focused intensity of a sensory experience and Se has to do with variety of sensory experiences. This is what I read about it as well. Si does not only have to do with order and detail, but it can easily entail that. Se does not only have to do with pushing the limits, but it can easily entail that. Given that, some of mal's Si pics are accurate. I think Se or Si both can be explored alone or with others which makes it hard to identify which is being used.
Yes it is very abstract.
I wonder who and what it's about because that thought is something I always see associated with Si.
My first thought was that it was a witch who was frolicking around by herself. I didn't take it much further than that before reading what you had to say about it.
It's because of all the function talk that goes on around here, that has more to do with thinking methods than behaviors or personalities. It is raised to such a level of abstractedness as to lose all touch with reality.
Yes it is very abstract.
Jung doesn't talk about the Si living in accordance with the past. So I take it some other theorist along the way decided that was the case.
I wonder who and what it's about because that thought is something I always see associated with Si.
A witch silhouette.....But I'm curious to know, from your ISFJ perspective, what do you think is going on in that picture?
My first thought was that it was a witch who was frolicking around by herself. I didn't take it much further than that before reading what you had to say about it.