And I am going to object. Any type of person (MBTI or generic type) can succeed in any field, as long as you go in with your eyes open, and a good idea of what you have to contribute, and how to make it work for you. Often those atypical people have the most to offer in a career, since they will break the groupthink and provide essential contrasting perspectives.I'm gonna nip this one in the bud; based off what you have explained about yourself, you do NOT belong in the STEM field and would not last long at all.
And I am going to object. Any type of person (MBTI or generic type) can succeed in any field, as long as you go in with your eyes open, and a good idea of what you have to contribute, and how to make it work for you. Often those atypical people have the most to offer in a career, since they will break the groupthink and provide essential contrasting perspectives.
Better to ask: what STEM fields would make sense for someone of your nature, interests, values, and goals? For instance, I think you mentioned working in pharmacy? The medical end of STEM (often added as a second "M") might offer the best prospects. On the other hand, don't overlook the role of technology in fields like education, or engineering in addressing environmental issues or even poverty (e.g. how to provide clean water at low cost).
The main flaw with this argument is that one cannot speak of THE "STEM field". STEM, often written STEMM to include medicine, is extremely multifaceted. As such, we cannot generalize about jobs within STEM(M) this way. While doing laboratory research or nursing might be a very bad fit for MQ, these are only 2 of hundreds of career options. Anyone can find a suitable career within STEMM if that is where their interests lie, just as anyone can find a suitable career outside of it. Technology, however, is impacting more and more of human life such that avoiding it may become near impossible, regardless of your career choice.I had a distinct feeling you'd disagree with me. I do not agree with the notion of just blindly encouraging everyone into the STEM field, or any field for that matter. For kids, sure I'm fine with it so it's done for exposure. Magic Qwan is an adult though, so this is a different matter. More importantly though, he's shown in many many different ways that he is not even remotely fit for the STEM field.
MQ is not the only one reading this thread, or potentially benefitting from any advice given. It is a legitimate question placed in the proper subforum. As threads often do, it may evolve quite beyond the intentions of the OP.For starts, he tried nursing for a while, and could not even keep up with the most basic procedures and work required. There's enough overlap at the get go to use it as a point of indication of success or failure in areas related to it. He has professed his short attention span, hatred of detail, failure at rudimentry matters, and severe lack of work ethic. While these things can be worked around, I am almost completely convinced he could not. Largely because I gather he isn't willing to. This thread is just another in a long line of threads of hot-air speculation that amounts to nothing more than an attention grab, with no intent to actually do anything substantiating. All he wants are pep talks and to have them somehow magically do the work for him. We encouraged him to confine these things to his blog as to not clutter up the forum with his cries or hyerbolic pity parties, but it seems he's forgotten about this again, largely because he wasn't getting attention. This is ultimately nothing new.
The main flaw with this argument is that one cannot speak of THE "STEM field". STEM, often written STEMM to include medicine, is extremely multifaceted. As such, we cannot generalize about jobs within STEM(M) this way. While doing laboratory research or nursing might be a very bad fit for MQ, these are only 2 of hundreds of career options. Anyone can find a suitable career within STEMM if that is where their interests lie, just as anyone can find a suitable career outside of it. Technology, however, is impacting more and more of human life such that avoiding it may become near impossible, regardless of your career choice.
MQ is not the only one reading this thread, or potentially benefitting from any advice given. It is a legitimate question placed in the proper subforum. As threads often do, it may evolve quite beyond the intentions of the OP.
I took another aptitude test and I still score consistantly high in STEM. What are good STEM fields?
(Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics)
Thank you, [MENTION=10786]Swivelinglight[/MENTION]. When you speak about VENT, you mean Ventrillo, right?Since this thread seems to be more about MQ than the actual topic, I'll throw my two cents in. It seems to me that this isn't about attention whoring, but more so about MQ having a potential quarter life crisis. I've seen it a couple of times on some occupational subreddits, so it looks kind of familiar. The best advice I can give regarding this situation is to look up all the potential options and tune it down to a few good ones. Once you're stuck between a few options that are similar in outlook it would be best to pick the best one you have going for you. After you pick don't look back, and go completely all out with that one option.
edit: also, while this thread is a good effort in finding potential options; it's not very good in general. Typoc is not an ideal place to find information on potential occupations. Except maybe on vent, when you could talk to people in person about their jobs, but you're still limited to the jobs that people on vent have or had. Therefore, I really do suggest googling occupations, taking career tests, taking college major quizzes, and looking at certain subreddits.
I had a distinct feeling you'd disagree with me. I do not agree with the notion of just blindly encouraging everyone into the STEM field, or any field for that matter. For kids, sure I'm fine with it so it's done for exposure. Magic Qwan is an adult though, so this is a different matter. More importantly though, he's shown in many many different ways that he is not even remotely fit for the STEM field.
For starts, he tried nursing for a while, and could not even keep up with the most basic procedures and work required. There's enough overlap at the get go to use it as a point of indication of success or failure in areas related to it. He has professed his short attention span, hatred of detail, failure at rudimentry matters, and severe lack of work ethic. While these things can be worked around, I am almost completely convinced he could not. Largely because I gather he isn't willing to. This thread is just another in a long line of threads of hot-air speculation that amounts to nothing more than an attention grab, with no intent to actually do anything substantiating. All he wants are pep talks and to have them somehow magically do the work for him. We encouraged him to confine these things to his blog as to not clutter up the forum with his cries or hyerbolic pity parties, but it seems he's forgotten about this again, largely because he wasn't getting attention. This is ultimately nothing new.
[MENTION=18694]Magic Qwan[/MENTION]. I'm gonna give you some advice.I took another aptitude test and I still score consistantly high in STEM. What are good STEM fields?
(Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics)