Cool replies. We can all agree on extrovert at least. I didn't think he was Ti because he often jests at theory or playing around with his own rationale (Not that he jests in a bad way.. I can't really find a vid now, but he's definitely more focused on the area of astrophysics that revolves more around objective data/objective processes and research. I don't know his whole career, but he seems like he'd rather talk about all of this and dispense this knowledge. Not talk about theories. Michio Kaku or Feynman were different). Yet, I still think he's heavy on the Ne.
The assumption has always been to construct MBTI type from JCF. But what if you worked it backward? Reverse engineering.
We know that JCF leaves out the crucial distinction between J and P, leaving this decision as an assumption based on other factors such that, for example, NeTi automatically warrants a P. But what if it turns out that the personality in question is a J and not a P after all? Then your previous statements are thrown into question.
I think he's a J, and I really don't have enough information to change my mind about ENFJ. "I can't really find a vid now, but he's definitely more focused on the area of astrophysics that revolves more around objective data/objective processes and research." There are tons of vids out there on this guy, so obviously the one you're looking for doesn't exist because he is not like that. The ones I looked at didn't tell me enough about him so I have to go by visual clues. But as far as your statement there goes, you are completely wrong. Neil is completely focused on the value of science to society, even in the spiritual sense. And on the other hand, he is focused on the disvalue of anti-science. For example, here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BbLDKLQYrg8
and this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MMED5boxySs
"We are all connected: to each other, biologically; to the earth, chemically; and to the rest of the earth, atomically. That's kind of cool. That makes me smile." "We're in the universe, and the universe is in us."
and this:
"2006 Neil deGrasse Tyson closes the three day lecture series with an excellent final "sermon" on cosmic perspective and the impact of science."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6RjW5-4IiSc
"And then I sort of
feel bad for the photon. And I said 'maybe it wanted to continue?' But I got in its way."
Neil humanizes photons coming into his telescope. How Ti is that? Not very.
There you go. I don't mind doing your research for you at all, as it only brings more evidence to support my view.