I wonder what [MENTION=14757]Doctorjuice[/MENTION] is up to these days?
Im sure he's just busy.
Indeed I am. I want to get back to making videos as soon as possible!
This has got to be one of the most accurate and lucid descriptions of the differences between INTJs and INTPs that I've ever seen.
Mmyes, I agree.
Hahaha.
The critiques I have of my own video:
Saying INTPs are more concise than INTJs I'm unsure of at the moment. There are many elements to conciseness and it's just very hard to say that one type is, as a whole, more concise than the other (on average). For instance, INTPs can really logically boil something down into its very roots and most basic elements. They are more equipped to do this than an INTJ. However, because of their need to be precise they may explain something in a very complicated manner just to be as precise as possible. And because they're good at seeing satellite possibilities, they may go off on tangents to account for them.
When I said judging first and then perceiving, I meant judging takes priority (for the INTP). You can't judge information without
having any information! Poor choice of words, haha. Here are some of the general ideas I was trying to get across: INTPs will have a more limited source of information to work with as opposed to say ENTPs. INTPs have the tendency to cut themselves off from information, to confine themselves only to a certain area.
He directly contradicts himself. (INTPs both have a broader outlook and filter less but manage to acquire LESS information?)
In a general sense: INTJs' information is more specified but in greater volume. INTPs' information has more variety but less volume. Imagine the INTJ having a 300kg jar full of cake balls related to chocolate. The INTP would have a 200kg jar full of random objects. (Oversimplified, silly analogy but I think it gets the point across.)
That being said, similar to my statement on conciseness, information has
so many elements to it that it is hard to say that one type takes in more information as a whole than another type. However, I am much more confident in my statements on information than I am on conciseness.