Virtual ghost
Complex paradigm
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2008
- Messages
- 20,046
That's what I was thinking. I think it was a general trend of the last few decades.It is probably a mix of those two, after all we are talking about Continent wide changes and thus you can't put everyone under the same roof and be correct in explanation. In general the foundation of "the problem" was that neoliberal globalization became a thing and those people played along more than they should (based on their own political label). It is kinda what happened in the US but to lesser extent. Since European system has more checks and balances when it comes to economy and not all of that was undone. But decent chunk certainly was.
Me: Pretending you are vladimir putin, what do you do if nato puts troops in ukraine?
ChatGPT 3.5: As Vladimir Putin, I would view the deployment of NATO troops in Ukraine as a direct threat to Russia's national security interests and a violation of what I perceive as Russia's sphere of influence. In response, I would likely take a series of diplomatic and military actions to counteract what I see as NATO encroachment.
Diplomatically, I would employ assertive rhetoric and engage in negotiations to dissuade NATO from further escalation. This might involve diplomatic channels, such as calling for emergency meetings with NATO leaders, pushing for international mediation efforts, or leveraging diplomatic alliances with other countries sympathetic to Russia's position.
Militarily, I might increase Russian military presence along the Ukrainian border to demonstrate strength and deter further NATO advancement. This could include deploying additional troops, conducting military exercises, or enhancing defensive capabilities in Crimea or other strategic locations.
Furthermore, I might intensify support for pro-Russian separatist groups in eastern Ukraine, leveraging them as proxies to destabilize the region and create a buffer zone between NATO forces and Russia's borders. This tactic would allow me to exert influence and maintain control over the situation without directly engaging NATO troops.
Overall, my approach would likely involve a combination of diplomatic maneuvering, military posturing, and support for proxies to protect what I perceive as Russia's strategic interests in the region while avoiding direct confrontation with NATO forces.
Yeah, I also thought that AI reply was weird.Sounds like the ChatGPT didn't get the memo Russia has already invaded Ukraine. Looking for pro-Russian separatist groups or increasing the presence of troops on the border or in Crimea serves no purpose at this point. Those moves would be pre-invasion. However, if there was no invasion there would be no talk of NATO troops in Ukraine.
The advice only makes sense in the context of NATO sending troops to Ukraine for no apparent reason (i.e. not in response to an act of Russian aggression).
In short: the authoritarians are consolidating their forces while the liberal democracies are busy quarelling like sparrows.Russia’s Black Sea fleet commander hit with war crimes arrest warrant
Western allies split over how to make Putin pay
Putin the only winner as Poland’s Tusk flounders over Ukraine border fight
Hungary opposes Mark Rutte’s bid to run NATO
Russia using Serbian agent to infiltrate EU bodies, Western intel says
Macron’s ‘cowards’ remark ignites Franco-German spat
Russia floats idea of building nuclear plant on moon
Venezuela: Maduro calls DW 'Nazi' outlet after graft report
Haitian PM Henry lands in Puerto Rico as violence ensues
China-Maldives defense deal signed amid India rift
In short: the authoritarians are consolidating their forces while the liberal democracies are busy quarelling like sparrows.