T
ThatGirl
Guest
(EDIT: Let's try again! ~ Jennifer)
NT/NF vs Probability/Possibility
How does it relate?
Go!
NT/NF vs Probability/Possibility
How does it relate?
Go!
Last edited by a moderator:
To OP:
My guess is that NFs focus on possibility, while NTs focus on probability.
To ongoing thread joke:
She lost her real asshole, so she had a new asshole made out of thread, and she has a message woven into it. She wants us to read it, because she can't see back there, and can't figure out how to read stuff backwards in the mirror.
I focus on probability quite a lot. Does that make me an NT?
It's more about the nature of probability, probability itself is just a mere instrument.
You can say for example: his behaviour will lead to his demise. But basing it on, not to all participants visible facts. And then you can say: I am 75% sure it will.
Ni is usually associated with probability, and Ne with possibilities.
What do you mean? Ni and Si are dynamic, irrational elements, whereas Se and Ne are static, irrational elements.So then here is my question: Why the differentiation between N functions? Wouldn't N be "possibility" and S "probability" if we wanted to go that route?
Sounds like your describing Ti.Ni is all about infinite numbers of frameworks and ways to view a situation.
Sounds like your describing Ti.
Because J/P is about what is used externally, rather than dominantly, which does make a lot of sense. Internal vs external judging makes a big noticeable difference in personality. That's what others will be affected by the most.One thing I don't understand is how a P (an irrational type ...) type could be a Ti dominant. Silly Myers Brigg p/j addition.
Because J/P is about what is used externally, rather than dominantly, which does make a lot of sense.
Because J/P is about what is used externally, rather than dominantly, which does make a lot of sense. Internal vs external judging makes a big noticeable difference in personality. That's what others will be affected by the most.
I'm well aware, hence my comment "Silly Myer Briggs p/j addition." It doesn't make sense (it differs from both Jung's typology and Socionics), and has led to many problems with type descriptions.