-terrible logic (1+1 = abstract potato)
-making connections that simply aren't there
-thinking that evidence for what they are saying is not important
-getting stuck in needless details (stuff like connotations or meanings of things)
-unable to get to the point or simplify
-unable to see what is important just wants to bounce on ideas
-needlessly over complicate
-unable to screen out false logic want to include everything
-doesn't give a damn about the objective truth just wants to argue
-can't objectively analyze something like Ti can
-no critical or independent thought just assumes connections (drives me mad)
-under values common sense and real world evidence that you can see with your eyes
It's sort of like I have the road map to the destination and it looks like a simple straight line and it would take 2 seconds to get there not a big deal. And I'm like hey Ne guy it's this way but the Ne user is doing zig zags driving under water and through trees and off cliffs. I clash the most with ENTPs and I find INTPs to think more like ENTPs than ISTPs.
Logic, critical thinking, analysis, and independent thought are T (specifically in the realm of Ti) related meaning that those have nothing to do with the four interpreting functions Se, Si, Ne, Ni.
Ne users argue with you to test your belief in your own system and see how capable you are in defending your viewpoint in the ENTP's case.
The following is not always indicative of the ENFP but is of the ENTP:
Making connections that simply aren't there - Agree, but Ti filters out wrong connections if working properly
Thinking that evidence for what they are saying is not important - That's why Ti is there to moderate it, this is not indicative of any interpreting function
Getting stuck in endless details - Endless ideas maybe but not Endless details
Unable to get to the point or simplify - That's what Ti is for if it is functioning properly
Unable to see what is important just wants to bounce on ideas - Ne perceives the big picture in a model of future possibilities and different routes for tackling problems, Ne users bounce ideas to eliminate routes and find the most effective one.
Needlessly over complicate - Sometimes happens, but if Ti is functioning properly than it will eliminate complications that aren't efficient.
Unable to screen out false logic, want to include everything - Eh I'll give you that one, but if Ti is developed properly then it would disprove the false logic and keeps Ne focused
Doesn't give a damn about the objective truth just wants to argue - Agreed
Can't objectively analyze something like Ti can - That's obvious, Ne doesn't analyze, and neither does Ni, Se, or Si for that matter.
Under values common sense and real world evidence that you can see with your eyes - Agreed
You can't fucking weigh Se logic against Ne logic, because they don't exist. There is Ne-Ti logic and Ti-Se logic, but interpreting functions don't possess any logic, that is for the realm of Ti (and somewhat Te).