I remembered your suggestion, but...
I just don't see what you want with those archetypes. I don't see the link between eg. a sixth function and a witch. Should I give ESTJ's Se a witch hat, or what? I guess I don't know enough about archetypes. To be clear: I don't know anything about them. Care to enlighten me?
I've just taken those functions almost as constants - Te is always the one caring about efficiency and getting the work done,...
I've put them in an environment which would represent the type - ESTJ gets a courthouse, ENTP gets a laboratorium,...
I've made them stronger or weaker according to type. I tried to make them, well, "function" like they are, while at the same time arriving at a decision the type would make on the issue.
Here is ENTP's laboratorium! See, even here Te is caring about efficiency
To Ne, the new ideas are always better than the previous ones. That's the trouble with Ne!
Here's one place I explain why 6th place is a witch
http://www.typologycentral.com/forums/844121-post68.html (and that's really only for women. For men, it's a cranky old man). The positive side of either is wisdom.
The "witch" is just a negative aspect of the parent complex associated with the auxiliary. The dominant function is the main ego-achiever, and the auxiliary then is about "support"; hence a "parent". The opposite orientation of the auxiliary will be negative, and employed by the negative aspect of the parental complex.
My wife is ESFJ, and not only do I experience her witch Se, but her mother is ESTJ, and she's experienced that herself.
They are quick to find fault in the way things look. They can spot something wrong in a blink; something a sensotard would
never see on their own, nor think mattered. And they will often react sharply over it. (If the Se is developed somewhat, then they will experience its positive side of enjoying the way things look as well).
So in your courthouse, Se is saying it's thirsty, reflecting its normal external concrete focus.
To add the archetype to this, you would have the figure complaining bitterly and blaming, making sharp attacks against others, etc. to express that thirst. Like perhaps "I'M THIRSTY, YOU @#$%*s!!!!"
Likewise, in the ENTP laboratory, Te should be there picking fault with the way things are organized. That is basically what it is doing in your illustration. But to really be Critical Parent, it would likewise be "CAN'T YOU FIND SOMETHING FEASIBLE, YOU @#$%*s?!!!". In either case, they would stop people dead in their tracks.
In Wonka's illustration, the "devil" might actually be more Trickster Ti, which is the negative aspect of the tertiary. The "demon" archetype is really the 8th function, which is Se for the ENFP, and the Trickster is 7th, but that would be closer to the "devil conscience" that opposes the Fi "angel". (I've heard other Fi users claim Fi was
both angel and devil sitting on one's shoulders). The tertiary or "child" complex is more about childlike innocence, hence, an ENFP will use his Te to find "relief" in organizing and stuff like that. I don't think it will really be about "they're fools; listen to me". The Child is weak and vulnerable, even if the Te it is associated with we normally think of as strong and effective. The Trickster is the one that would come up and fill in for the vulnerability of the child, and that would make sense here. It's Ti that would say they were all fools, based on
internal principles (that are normally ignored, but will be utilized when the Child is threatened) to contradict the Fi's normally accepted internal values.